What’s your evidence, Richard Easton??!?

  •  FBJimmy   ( @FBJimmy@lemmus.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    455 months ago

    Great to recognise this invention.

    I was surprised by the choice of ‘Mother of Wi-Fi’ though - Wi-Fi hasn’t used ‘frequency hopping’ as such since 802.11b was released back in 1999 - so very few people will have ever used frequency-hopping Wi-Fi.

    GPS only uses it in some extreme cases I think, but I’m not an expert.

    However, Bluetooth absolutely does depend on it to function in most situations, so ‘Mother of Bluetooth’ might have been more appropriate.

      •  FBJimmy   ( @FBJimmy@lemmus.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I guess my point is that it isn’t a particularly important part of the design of Wi-Fi - they included it in the very first iteration in 1997 and realised by 1999 they didn’t need it. Therefore Wi-Fi would likely have been born regardless of the invention; Bluetooth would not.