I am not the author.

  •  CrypticCoffee   ( @CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    SystemD is not an init system. It provides that functionality, but processes have more life cycle steps than just initialize.

    When you accept that, you realise that you cannot compare them.

    SystemD provides functionality that they don’t. Of course those that refuse to consider this will just claim it’s bloat. To some DE’s are bloat.

    •  Findmysec   ( @Findmysec@infosec.pub ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Systemd is no longer just an init system, but the project began with Poettering’s dislike of other init systems. I use systemd and I do not like its performance (too slow in some cases).

      The tragedy is that being an end-user, it is ridiculously hard to replace systemd on “regular” distros. Admittedly, Debian can be moved back to sysVinit without backbreaking work, but the fact is that distros don’t seem to have any intention of providing choice, making applications assume that systemd exists wherever they will be installed. That is the complaint I have against the Linux community