- queermunist she/her ( @queermunist@lemmy.ml ) 76•4 months ago
Looks like I’m testing not using YouTube.
- jlow (he/him) ( @jlow@beehaw.org ) 32•4 months ago
Yeah, that’ll be hard. I’m trying to use Peertube but network effect is big on YT (not sure if that’s the right expression here, noone is using Peertube, everyone is on YT).
- Marud ( @lemmymarud@lemmy.marud.fr ) 24•4 months ago
I’m sending my videos on my Peertube and Youtube. I send the link for Peertube a few days before Youtube, so people following me would have more interest on looking at it on PT earlier but the numbers can’t be beaten : between 5 and 20 views on PT against 1K / 2K on Youtube.
- 🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖 ( @muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee ) English2•4 months ago
Whats the link? I though peer tube comments where compatible with lemmy.
- lockhart ( @lockhart@lemmy.ml ) 8•4 months ago
try odysee, some creators mirror their yt vids there
- jabathekek ( @jabathekek@sopuli.xyz ) 15•4 months ago
I like Odysee, but there’s a lot of right-wing bullshit on there that give me a major case of cringe.
- kevincox ( @kevincox@lemmy.ml ) 5•4 months ago
So don’t watch it? I would rather the platform all all legal content then trying to be the morality police.
I would also prefer to use third party recommendation engines (like people posting on Lemmy) then one run by any particular platform.
- jabathekek ( @jabathekek@sopuli.xyz ) 8•4 months ago
Sure, but it’s literally every other thumbnail and it pisses me off as I do not tolerate intolerance.
- umbrella ( @umbrella@lemmy.ml ) 4•4 months ago
be the change you want to see in the world
- Onihikage ( @Onihikage@beehaw.org ) English3•4 months ago
Odysee takes a lot of curation to even be usable. You can block whole channels easily and they won’t show up for you anywhere, but once you’ve blocked all the RWB you’re left with mostly tech, gaming, and reactions. And this is despite Odysee/LBRY having been around for years.
- Bilb! ( @bilb@lem.monster ) English3•4 months ago
That’s not unlike youtube really
- BearOfaTime ( @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee ) 5•4 months ago
I watch at most 1 video a week. It’s not hard.
- lemmyreader ( @lemmyreader@lemmy.ml ) English2•4 months ago
Yeah, that’ll be hard. I’m trying to use Peertube but network effect is big on YT (not sure if that’s the right expression here, noone is using Peertube, everyone is on YT).
There was a time “noone” was on YouTube.
- 0xtero ( @0xtero@beehaw.org ) 9•4 months ago
Been using Nebula for a while now. Going to miss some YouTube creators, but I’ll expect to get over it.
- GravitySpoiled ( @GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml ) English30•4 months ago
That’ll make youtube disappear for me.
Over the years I watched less and less. I only seldomly have to look into youtube for things that are easier in video than in text.
Teens and many people don’t know that there is a world without ads. They have to be educated that there are alternatives - not watching youtube is a real option. You do not depend on it.
I’s a horrible world many people live in. Recently I saw someone browsing on instagram, each third post is an ad and oftentimes there are ads after ads. And people follow other people and watch their ads. Incredible!
Recently, I was browsing linkedin and there were 12 ads instead of real jobs in a row. in a row. Unrelated to my profession.
- TheFriar ( @TheFriar@lemm.ee ) 8•4 months ago
But the point is there’s always been a way to avoid ads, even while browsing sites with ads and browsing YT. Personally, if that ability entirely disappears, i hate ads, ad-voice, and the concept of advertising so much that I will stop and close a whole tab if an ad plays. I’m in the minority though. Because, I think you’re right, a lot of people just don’t even think about it and mindlessly consume. I can’t. When Reddit fucked us and showed us our opinions and feelings didn’t matter, I left. I will do the same to YT.
- Jeena ( @jeena@piefed.jeena.net ) 2•4 months ago
I think I hate ads just as much. But I might cave in and start subscribing to premium again. I just stopped because they don’t allow a family plan here in Korea.
- Aloomineum ( @Aloomineum@beehaw.org ) 2•4 months ago
I will just start downloading videos and watching them at my leisure. Anything to not give this corp my money. Funny thing is I use to have no problem watching ads on youtube until they increased the amount and started spamming ads for gambling. There is an option to select on your google account that limits the amount of gambling ads you see. I had that enabled and it felt like it increased the amount of gambling ads it was serving me.
- RotatingParts ( @RotatingParts@lemmy.ml ) English18•4 months ago
This is where we could use a browser plug in that uses AI to learn what an ad is and skip it for us. Now we just need someone to start working on it.
- IllNess ( @IllNess@infosec.pub ) 7•4 months ago
Plugins can add controls and it can download videos, but plugins can’t interact with videos directly I think.
Maybe use the Youtube API closed captions and figure out the patterns for ads that way?
- Creat ( @Creat@discuss.tchncs.de ) 2•4 months ago
Of course they can interact with it just fine, look at “sponsorblock” plug-in. It would also solve this problem completely. It already exists and works well, it just isn’t “AI” nonsense.
- Jeena ( @jeena@piefed.jeena.net ) 3•4 months ago
You are missing the point that sponsorblock only works without AI because everyone gets the same video delivered. Once they have targeted ads of variable length and amount you need someone to watch your specific version of the video and do the tagging where the ads ans sponsors are. You could pay someone to do it for you but that is expensive and very slow. Or you can train a ML model to recognize the patterns and tag it for you hopefully pretty fast.
- IllNess ( @IllNess@infosec.pub ) 2•4 months ago
Yes, that is adding controls and using a database from the SponsorBlock server.
What I mean is a plugin cannot see the video. Like you can’t write
if(screen == adScreen) { then skipToNextSegment(); }
The plugin isn’t reading the video, it is getting info from a database. For AI or machine learning to work ad injection, which might change for every user, doing what SponsorBlock is doing is not enough.
YT has 2 posibilities
- Hosting all videos doble, one with ads and the same vids without for premium user
- Insert also markers which at the end also are exploited by adblockers and userscripts
I think they’ll hit their teeth against a rock with this.
Meanwhile a lot of content creators a changing to Odysee
- ShortN0te ( @ShortN0te@lemmy.ml ) 11•4 months ago
- Hosting all videos doble, one with ads and the same vids without for premium user
Not quite sure why, they simply could in the fly stitch those files together.
Twitch is doing that for a while now i think.
- kevincox ( @kevincox@lemmy.ml ) 4•4 months ago
Exactly this. It isn’t even really “stitching” as YouTube videos are served as a series of short chunks anyways. So you simply tell the player that there are a few extra chunks which happen to be ads. There is no video processing required it is basically free to do it this way on the sever side.
- ShortN0te ( @ShortN0te@lemmy.ml ) 2•4 months ago
That is true. But then you could probably use the chunk length to determine where the ads starts and ends since there is with a very high probability an unusually long chunk at those times.
- kevincox ( @kevincox@lemmy.ml ) 2•4 months ago
I don’t know about YouTube but the chunks are often a fixed length. For example 1 or 2 seconds. So as long as the ad itself is an even number of seconds (which YouTube can require, or just pad the add to the nearest second) so there is no concrete difference between the 1s “content” chunks vs the 1s “ad” chunks.
If you are trying to predict the ad chunks you are probably better off doing things like detecting sudden loudness changes, different colour tones or similar. But this will always be imperfect as these could just be scene changes that happened to be chunk aligned in the content.
- Lmaydev ( @Lmaydev@programming.dev ) 8•4 months ago
Actually the videos get stitched together dynamically.
- Jessica ( @SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) English6•4 months ago
I think they’ll hit their teeth against a rock with this.
Press X to doubt
Most people do not have an adblocker. Most people watch YouTube to varying degrees of frequency and duration. Most people will continue to watch the ads. I’d be surprised if YT noticed any amount of users leaving the site because of this. The privacy minded folk are few and far between.
- eveninghere ( @eveninghere@beehaw.org ) 3•4 months ago
Not precise. They can dynamically generate the video stream from the ad-free original.
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English1•4 months ago
Odysee is not an alternative
Better than any other- Well, there are some selfhosted video sites like PeerTube and others, but respect content are not a real alternative, nor other proprietary streaming sites, like removedute, Vimeo, Dailymotion, etc. Front-ends or desktop clients (FreeTube) with the new YT policy will die. What other alternatives then?
- JackbyDev ( @JackbyDev@programming.dev ) English11•4 months ago
I’m surprised it took them this long.
- SnokenKeekaGuard ( @SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 11•4 months ago
Oh dear lord no.
- edric ( @scytale@lemm.ee ) English11•4 months ago
Crap I just opened youtube today and it looks like I was chosen. The ads load like normal videos and it sucks. My brain actually glitched for a couple of seconds when I opened a video because I wasn’t used to seeing an ad. I dunno if there’s any chance uBO can even counter this.
Try to watch the video embedded, simply edit it’s URL, using instead of
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxxxxxxx
this URL
https://www.youtube.com/embed/xxxxxxxx
- edric ( @scytale@lemm.ee ) English5•4 months ago
Welp, restarted my laptop and I’m off the testing list so can’t replicate (unless I turn off uBO of course). But thanks, this will be handy if it happens again.
- Zeke ( @Zeke@fedia.io ) 8•4 months ago
Honestly, I just pull videos from Youtube to watch later. I don’t actually watch anything on Youtube. I do wonder if there’s an upcoming replacement for Youtube like there was for Twitter.
- haui ( @haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com ) 10•4 months ago
Peertube
- jlow (he/him) ( @jlow@beehaw.org ) 7•4 months ago
Would sponsorblock be a solution for this?
- jet ( @jet@hackertalks.com ) English8•4 months ago
With a little adoption yes it could. We could pass around checksums of known good blocks, or checksums of known advertisements. Or the audio signature of known good blocks or the audio signature of known advertisements.
So a service is like sponsor block would now just be a curated list of either good or bad signatures be them checksums or audio signatures or video signatures. There would be some engineering work to account for different compression ratios etc but it’s totally doable
- illi ( @illi@lemm.ee ) English8•4 months ago
From what I read, this also breaks sponsorblock - as the ads are part of the video, it moves the time stamps of the video so it makes it not correct. The ads will also change I imagine so idk if sponsorblock will be a solution.
- Jay K ( @jayknight@lemmy.ml ) English13•4 months ago
So videos that reference timestamps in their own video won’t work? And comments that reference a timestamp won’t work?
- Jeena ( @jeena@piefed.jeena.net ) 4•4 months ago
They could on the fly change them.
- gila ( @gila@lemm.ee ) English4•4 months ago
Wouldn’t that need to be done via some kind of API for cross-platform compatibility? An API which could be exploited to detect ad segments?
- Jeena ( @jeena@piefed.jeena.net ) 3•4 months ago
No, they would just do that internally in their own code, why would they need an API for that?
- gila ( @gila@lemm.ee ) English2•4 months ago
So that the timestamp adjustment can be propagated via uploader or user comments across YouTube clients on all platforms… i.e. to avoid having to hardcode each adjustment for each ad on each video on every client
- relevants ( @relevants@feddit.de ) 2•4 months ago
Why couldn’t they just serve the comments to each client with the ad-adjusted timestamps already? The only thing the client has to request then is the comment page it wants to load, and some unique ID for which the backend remembers which ad version it’s associated with.
No, not in it’s actual form, nor the front-ends can’t not longer cutting the ads with their current form. Or they change their script, or you have the alternative to use YT or using another streaming service. But I think that there will be other solution in the future to show the middle finger to YT.
- eveninghere ( @eveninghere@beehaw.org ) 6•4 months ago
I’d just drag the time seeker though…
- Bademantel ( @Bademantel@feddit.de ) 5•4 months ago
That move would finally rid me of my addiction to YouTube. So much time, so many possibilities…
- Track_Shovel ( @Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net ) English5•4 months ago
What are the YT alternatives? I use it by default and I’m to exhausted to look for another landing place
- kylian0087 ( @kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 6•4 months ago
Odysee ! I use a extention even so if I click a video on YouTube and it is also on odysee it opened odysee instead.
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English5•4 months ago
That is a good question
- RobotToaster ( @RobotToaster@mander.xyz ) 4•4 months ago
Can we train a local AI model to recognise ads?
Not with the crrent ones, it’s easier to difference ads by code than by content in most Vids, eg, divulgations, news, influencers, etc. YT, to not destroy the own business modell, also avoiding that there later also 5 years old vids with outdated ads, must use some kind of dynamic insertion, that means, it can be discovered and skipped by some userscripts, for sure not in the extension stores, but in Greasyfork or OpenuserJS, which are independent from Google influence.
- dan1101 ( @dan1101@lemm.ee ) 4•4 months ago
Honestly no idea why they didn’t just do that to begin with.
- elgordino ( @elgordino@fedia.io ) 7•4 months ago
Because it’s actually really hard to achieve technically. When ads are served outside the stream you can easily serve different ads to different viewers based on their profiles. When the ads are baked into the stream you can either
A) Create a whole bunch of different copies of the video asset with different ads baked in and then rotate these on a regular basis. Which would be expensive to update and store and limit the range of adverts that could be served to a particular user.
B) Dynamically create a stream on the users request, which while possible means standard CDN caching isn’t going to work so there’s a distribution challenge.
Or some other alternative they’ve come up with. I’d be really interest to know what their approach is here.
- magic_lobster_party ( @magic_lobster_party@kbin.run ) 4•4 months ago
They’re probably inserting the ads “on the fly”. It can be finicky depending on codec, but doable.
- Solemn ( @Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English3•4 months ago
Look up how HLS (HTTP Live Streaming) works. They just need to generate a personalized playlist for each person which points at things already hosted on CDN, and insert the ads where they want in the literal text file that your video player reads from to serve you the video.
I don’t know much about it, but it looks like there’s specific tags designed for dynamic ad insertion. Idk if YouTube plans to use them in this case though, if they want it to be undetectable to the client.
- Jeena ( @jeena@piefed.jeena.net ) 3•4 months ago
It’s easier and less resource hungry to deliver targeted ads like that.
- Greyghoster ( @Greyghoster@aussie.zone ) 4•4 months ago
It depends on what the publishers publish for. If it’s money then Peertube is probably not attractive.
As said, some creators already had changed to Odysee, because there they also can monetize their work, but without all the YT crap and nags, apart Odysee is freemium OpenSource https://github.com/OdyseeTeam