- cross-posted to:
- opensource@lemmy.ml
- postmarketos@lemmy.ml
- postmarketos@lemmy.ml
- Joe Bidet ( @JoeBidet@lemmy.ml ) 9•2 years ago
SourceHut is great. politically and ethically, it is the type of platforms (and code) we need for a resilient, decentralized, autonomous future! <3
- kixik ( @kixik@lemmy.ml ) 5•2 years ago
The the central webUI would be key for major players adoption, and more time as well. It’s been not long ago that debian, xorg, and arch (still in progress), migrated to gitlab, for example. Those migrations are expensive in people resources, and time.
And for regular individuals adoption, besides enabling the webUI, it might be way harder, unless someone contributes to sr.ht resources to allow hosting projects, with no CI support, but for free. It’s hard to get individuals adoption at some cost, even if that’s really a low cost, when there are alternatives, which BTW violate SW licenses, for free, :(
- Tiuku ( @Tiuku@sopuli.xyz ) 3•2 years ago
How does SourceHut compare to Gitea instances?
- Canard ( @Canard@lemmy.ml ) 5•2 years ago
The answer is in the article: https://postmarketos.org/blog/2022/07/25/considering-sourcehut/#why-not-giteacodebergother-github-inspired-forge
- Tiuku ( @Tiuku@sopuli.xyz ) 3•2 years ago
Ahh my bad, I stopped reading at “Rollout plan”.
Tldr: Gitea doesn’t have CI/CD
- linkert ( @linkert@lemmy.ml ) 3•2 years ago
Cool, I pay for sourcehut in order to get Gemini hosting and my shabby scripts hosted somewhere accessible. Nice to see a project like pmos consider Sourcehut.
Not a coder in any shape or form, just a hobbyist with sPeCiAl computer needs :)