I wonder how/if the states of these workers will reemploy them
- TheBaldFox ( @TheBaldFox@lemmy.ml ) 44•1 year ago
Oh, no!!! Anyway…
- sbr32 ( @sbr32@kbin.social ) 35•1 year ago
Prison industry faces thousands of layoffs as Allies liberate Nazi concentration camps!
- Metal Zealot ( @Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml ) 23•1 year ago
Good. That’s what you get for trying to go backwards in time
- guyrocket ( @guyrocket@kbin.social ) 22•1 year ago
I hear that solar companies are hiring.
- Allseer ( @StalksEveryone@futurology.today ) English18•1 year ago
coalminers: just making money, making sure my children have no future
- redhydride ( @redhydride@lemmy.ml ) 13•1 year ago
I’m surprised 1 million people still work in coal. Edit: 1 million globally. Makes more sense
- Sonori ( @sonori@beehaw.org ) 13•1 year ago
Friendly reminder that nearly all currently operating coal plants have been built scine the sixties, as before that it was often unprofitable to use for electricity production.
That’s right, we could have gone straight to nuclear and created the economies of scale necessary to bring down costs if we haven’t needed to find jobs for all the miners and poor lobbyists who had mined coal for home heating and industrial use.
We’ve also settled the science about the whole carbon killing us thing since the seventies, so there should have been plenty of time in the last fifty years to get rid of them.
- Uranium3006 ( @Uranium3006@kbin.social ) 2•1 year ago
Indeed. I’m very unhappy with how things have turned out.
der tekin 'er jerbss!
- faintwhenfree ( @faintwhenfree@lemmus.org ) English2•1 year ago
Only if Russia didn’t fuck up chernobyl neuclear would have more support. Fukushima never did that much to hurt public confidence in nuclear.
- sartalon ( @sartalon@futurology.today ) English1•1 year ago
Meanwhile, Californians have been attacking existing nuclear plants for years.
- Facebones ( @Facebones@reddthat.com ) 9•1 year ago
They’ve tried constantly to transition them but they’d rather starve than learn a new skill. I feel for them but if they only want to go all in on voting for “fascist force the country to run on coal” I don’t feel for them once the stopgaps run out.
Some of those communities ARE finding their way into the future though and I support supporting them.
- Uranium3006 ( @Uranium3006@kbin.social ) 1•1 year ago
The people who want to move on from coal move out, thus a sampling bias exists where the diehards live off promises that can’t be fulfilled
This is the best summary I could come up with:
SINGAPORE, Oct 10 (Reuters) - The global coal industry may have to shed nearly 1 million jobs by 2050, even without any further pledges to phase out fossil fuels, with China and India facing the biggest losses, research showed on Tuesday.
Hundreds of labour-intensive mines are expected to close in the coming decades as they reach the end of their lifespans and countries replace coal with cleaner low-carbon energy sources.
But most of the mines likely to shut down “have no planning underway to extend the life of those operations or to manage a transition to a post-coal economy,” U.S.-based think tank Global Energy Monitor (GEM) warned.
Dorothy Mei, project manager for GEM’s Global Coal Mine Tracker, said governments needed to make plans to ensure workers do not suffer from the energy transition.
GEM looked at 4,300 active and proposed coal mine projects around the world covering a total workforce of nearly 2.7 million.
China’s coal sector has already undergone several waves of restructuring in recent decades, with many mining districts in the north and northeast struggling to find alternative sources of growth and employment following pit closures.
The original article contains 351 words, the summary contains 188 words. Saved 46%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!