- aprilmay ( @aprilmay@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 25•1 year ago
Nuclear is the only one that can actually satisfy base load demand, we don’t have enough batteries in the world to make up for solar and wind. Nuclear is also the safest.
- Steeve ( @Steeve@lemmy.ca ) English3•1 year ago
Nuclear is safer than solar and wind? That doesn’t sound right
- Umbrias ( @Umbrias@beehaw.org ) 4•11 months ago
Vibes are the best way to tackle existential threats.
Nuclear is ridiculously safe. I mean that literally. No other industry is as safe and has as many regulations and as much oversight as nuclear power, largely unfounded.
Personally I’d prefer other industries get safer though to make up the gap.
- Five ( @Five@slrpnk.net ) English9•1 year ago
With a better worldwide energy grid, I’d like to think geothermal could be a contender too.
- nikscha ( @nikscha@feddit.de ) 7•1 year ago
Nuclear waste sucks!
BUT: We already have about 60 years worth of it, and we need to find a long term storage solution regardless.
And assuming we would double the amount of nuclear waste, then it would only take one additional half-time to decay.
Go nuclear!
- Tavarin ( @Tavarin@lemmy.ca ) 1•11 months ago
Spent fuel rod reactors are well into development, and they will be able to use that waste to generate power and leave behind non-radioactive materials.
- nikscha ( @nikscha@feddit.de ) 0•11 months ago
Yes that’s true but that’s also not the point. The point is that we already have a problem and making it twice the size doesn’t make it twice as bad
- Tavarin ( @Tavarin@lemmy.ca ) 1•11 months ago
It will take quite a while to double our spent fuel rods, and once we start using them for fuel we can tackle the rods faster than we produce them.
In the meantime underground storage works just fine without harming people or the environment much.
- RickyRigatoni ( @RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml ) 5•1 year ago
Replace solar with another nuclear reactor.
- BastingChemina ( @BastingChemina@slrpnk.net ) 3•11 months ago
OP what have you done ? You woke them up !
Now all the pro nuclear are going to comment under your post explaining why nuclear is better than hydro.
Also, even though hydroelectricity is amazing I think we already have dams on most of the suitable areas. There is not much room left for expansion.
- perestroika ( @perestroika@slrpnk.net ) 1•11 months ago
The confusing bit: solar is (thermo)nuclear - but we with our mirrors and panels are just a side effect of solar energy. A peculiar flavour of biomass created by the reactor, so to say. :P