join 2 the return, now it’s personal

For film production yes, for streaming distribution no

It does not seem to have an open email address for citizens, but there is a contact form open at this address “https://escribealpresidente.presidencia.gob.es/escribealpresidente” I guess if enough people write to you, they might start to pay attention.

Go ahead, good luck, if you think a signature or something can help you, send me a private message, as a Spanish citizen you have my support, but I think he is not going to pay any attention, he knows about mastodon but is afraid of losing impact or visibility or whatever

Last night there were regional elections in Spain; Sanchez’s assessment of the results was made on X

Neither the institutions nor he/his party have any say in Mastodon.

It is truly sad to live in a world where you don’t know if what I say is sarcasm.

On the other hand, specifying it is for cowards.

Something socially productive like asking yourself why you are poor if there are plenty of resources for everyone in society? Not interested

Because there is no solution, a James Bond will never come to kill the evil ones at their meeting on the dark side of the moon, there is simply no culprit to exchange for someone competent. It is only us, one after another, without order or concert added, who are to blame for all this shit

I think reality is the most terrifying option; nobody is in charge.

When one man, one vote became one dollar, one vote. Capitalism bought democracy.

The Bookwyrm app works perfectly for me, what’s wrong with it?

We all have a narrative and try to convince others; that’s what dialogue in forums is all about. The difference is whether it’s done in good faith, trying to debate, learn and share, or in bad faith, diverting, deceiving and pushing misleading debates to promote hidden ideas.

It is not always easy to distinguish one from another, and organized groups take advantage of that.

Is Lemmy important enough to attract bots with malicious political intentions? A victory for us.

On a more serious note, I don’t know of any truly effective way to prevent that beyond sheer, hard work and restraint, and even then it’s never easy to distinguish bad intention of legitimate dissenting opinions.

He totally looks like a cheesy movie supervillain.

I haven’t been able to read the full article because it’s behind a paywall, but I can see where it’s going. It treats these as two separate problems when they’re really the same thing. The actions of an aggressive United States and an expansionist Russia clearly fuel far-right parties, and this is part of that broader attack. Treating them as separate issues is a mistake.

On the other hand, the solution is also shared: creating a unified military structure — not 27 coordinated ones, but a single force. That would automatically include a common intelligence apparatus, which could effectively fight foreign interference in our elections and internal affairs. I’ve read about half a dozen calls from European leaders on this over the past year, but there’s still no concrete proposal on the table. If we keep waiting, by the time we finally unite it will be too late. As citizens, we need to apply pressure as much as we can.

So weapons only prevent tyranny when the majority is left-wing? That makes perfect sense.

I haven’t ignored it; I told you that if it works in one place and not in another, it’s because it’s not the key element.

So, gun ownership isn’t a determining factor in preventing tyranny, but it will increase the problems of violence in society. Noted.

Yes, in the USA it’s working great to prevent tyranny and the accumulation of power by the elites.

That would imply that there are different ways to experience sexuality. Good luck if you expect that to save you from heresy and excommunication.