That’s an interesting point. It does look that way to me if I concenrrate solely on the thteadmill, but if you look at her legs, you can see that the left one kicks the ground as she gets the momentum, which makes it go back looking plausible (at least to me) :(

But again, very hard to tell with the image this grainy.

I also thought the same, but the more I watch it, the less it feels like AI. The dangling thing in the handle doesn’t change speed or disappear after she gets in front of it, and the speed changes accordingly when the treadmill lurches a little forward. I thought that her legs clipped through the thing dangling from the roof, but she actually just kind of hugs around it. The physics of her jump feel slightly weird but that could absolutely be just me overthinking.

The video is ridiculously grainy so it’s hard to tell for sure whether it’s AI or not, but that getup and the fact that she’s doing that this casually towards fucking stairs makes me think that it’s nevertheless an edit of sorts.

What does it mean to proxy a repository through the site?

If you replaced the first o in mojado with an i, the sign could have indeed been in portuguse!

Why would you need to link a study to be able to say that something looks like crap?

As for why it looks like crap, tbh it’s likely just because our letters are very thin. Vertically, an l would take the same space in the line as an ー which makes absolutely no sense and makes the lines look like enshittified junk food. On the other hand, the characters in the languages you showed are squarish, which means that they look good in both orientations.

As for why it’s hard to read, as someone who’s learning japanese, it’s likely because people are just not used to it. While I started reading R-L fairly early in my learning journey and had no problem getting used to it, I had a friend who only started reading R-L after he was already pretty much fluent in the language, and he told me that he found reading it a little tricky despite reading L-R no problem. I assume that he read words, not letters, and reading in an orientation he was not used to threw him off. On the other hand, I was still learning so I read each character individually, which was why I didn’t feel much of a difference.

earwax

According to the blog:

What I’m about to introduce is a brand new OSS community chat app I’ve worked on solo, on and off, for the past 5 years. I believe it’s one of the closest public attempts at feature parity with platforms like Discord or Slack to date.

Without checking it, it’s likely that the first commit had already years of work.

How is this the first time I hear about mangoWC?

What are the advantages compared to searxng?

Usually yes, but afaik not in this case.

The argument would be:

“You are amab therefore not a woman”

Which implies:

“You are either amab either a woman”

But a question remains:

¿Por qué no los dos?

This article gives me vibes that someone wrote a few lines outlining the situation and asked the AI to write the article itself. Interestingly though, I think most people would just rather read the outline, less time wasted and less llm.

A part that screams AI would be:

This wasn’t subtle venue security—your biometric data became part of the artistic statement, whether you consented or not.

“This isn’t this–it’s that” is an extremely common AI sentence structure, further exposed by the fact that the part before the em-dash doesn’t even make sense to begin with. No one was asking themselves whether it was part of subtle venue security.

As a sidenote, sometimes I read sentences like this and I wonder “could this ever even have been written by a human?” I think that there’s a very low chance that this article didn’t have at least some amount of AI involved, but I know that somewhere out there there must be some people who actually write like this. And that’s kind of sad.

tbh I don’t even know why I even wrote this, the entire article appears to be one big example of generic AI writing

Yep! What I wanted was for a “just works” experience as much as possible. Having to manually install lsps and treesitter parsers manually with nix felt like a bummer, honestly. It does work though

That is incredibly interesting. You didn’t have problems with treesitter failing to compile, or lsps and daps failing to run? What were the necessary packages that you installed? And how did you install lazyvim through home-manager, to begin with?

Wow I skimmed through your config and it seemed really good! This is really simple and easy to understand. I made this post because I’d wanted to keep my lazyvim configuration, but if I were to want to completely rewrite it with nix from the ground up it’d likely either be with nixvim or something like yours!