Pgp is based

Their cop-out is saying, “TailsOS only includes packages from debian repos.” So, I am guessing, before feather gets into TailsOS, it would need to be in debian stable. Can we get a debian maintainer for Feather?

Is there something we can do about getting Feather Wallet by default into TailsOS?

See this: https://monero.observer/monero-v0.18.3.4-fluorine-fermi-tagged/

Feather’s the best desktop wallet.

Done 👍

The entire reason for these being manageable without sudo permission, as a regular unprivileged user is that they don’t modify the system, but only the installation in your home directory.

Yes, and therefore AppImages are great for use in TailsOS and Qubes-Whonix.

Read this: https://github.com/haveno-dex/haveno/issues/270#issuecomment-2294807880

Bounty increased to 2 XMR.

Do you follow the -dev and no-wallet-left-behind irc/matrix room discussions? Kayabanerve posts some good updates on the work being done. Last time I checked was that they were getting math proofs for the FCMP.

specify the network to connect to from the official build

That would very useful.

people have success

Which people? Probably technically-minded, and over-determined people, yes. But do we want only such people have access to Haveno? Absolutely not. People who are only able to burn TailsOS onto a USB should also be able to hop-onto using Haveno and contribute to Monero"s distributed liquidity.

you literally can

No I literally cannot! (maybe). AppImage model of running a program is exactly the same as running an exe file. Download, allow executable, and run. Most newcomers easily get disheartened when they read that they need to unzip a deb file or something.

AppImage is absolutely necessary for users of TailsOS and Qubes-Whonix.

Full membership proofs will solve the issues, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. It can’t arrive soon enough (provided that the maths and the code implementation are sound and secure, of course).

I think the rift between haveno devs and the haveno-reto devs is causing some project management issues. One such example that I get direct exposure is around adding a flatpak and AppImage packaging for Haveno(-Reto) and another is around how (or should?) should the users be able to switch between mainnet providers.

For the example of the first one read down from this message: https://github.com/haveno-dex/haveno/issues/270#issuecomment-2294807880

And for the example of the second one, read down this issue: https://github.com/haveno-dex/haveno/issues/931

There is a friction in trying to coordinate and contribute to the developers working on different (albeit quite similar) repos (in the case of the original Haveno repo and the -Reto repo). This friction in comms and contribution is causing delays in introducing software distribution packages such as AppImage and Flatpaks, which hinders (especially for TailsOS and Qubes-Whonix users) the onboarding of the new users, and decentralizing Monero’s liquidity.

What’s your point?

Last week’s Skepticism thread was here: https://monero.town/post/3884733

I am indeed salty about INVOLUNTARY taxation.

I am not in the business of rescuing the world.

Aight. Good for you.

first you are wrong.

wrong about what?

Excluding smartphone slaves would be a big plus.

Depending on your goal. If your goal is to have an exclusive club of monero users, yeah, be my guest. But if you want to reach some critical mass with your monero-related discussion community, some level of ease of access to the discussion medium helps.