

Good news! You’ve been identified as a sucker!
fka: mrbeano@lemm.ee (but who cares?)


Good news! You’ve been identified as a sucker!


And it’s up to each person to decide what they want private, for any reason they like.
I’ve never been concerned about people who close their blinds, but I’m very concerned about people who feel they have a right to peek through them.


“Chuck! We’re gonna need a whole lotta ghosts!”


And, if they aren’t recognizing you for your efforts, hopefully you’re learning the process enough to move on to another company? Sometimes just being able to “speak the language” of that position in an interview is enough to get on the door, even if you’re light on actual experience. Many people are doing the jobs of their managers already!


If your goal is to subvert “evidence-based” policy, are you really a “think-tank”? Can’t we label them accurately?
Feelings-Farm?


If you can scope 3rd-party CSS, because the client HAS to use that particular chat vendor, then maybe this can keep their chocolate out of my peanut butter?
The unprincipled, hiding behind principles (when convenient)
Not retreating, but definitely moving in the wrong direction


Thank you for sharing!

Apparently, facts are meaningless in the face of authoritarian feelings


“Oh no! It’s the consequences of my own actions!”


You know, whatever, it’s just literally publicly-funded terrorism
Do you know any good white basketball players?