hey @nutomic@lemmy.ml, any ideas? It mostly happens when I sort by new. Makes lemmy unusable.
I have both German and English as my languages and as the languages my server supports.
Choosing a language on every post is kinda tedious, I forget to do it most of the time. Sometimes this leads to the post not being able to send, but on some subs it does send, but with the wrong language setting.
I mostly post in English, but unfortunately German is the default chosen setting, I think because it is in the top of the list.
I don't even think that a language setting necessarily is a bad idea, but the way it works it differs massively from reddit, right?
Also when I sent a post, I can't see which language I did choose, so I have to click edit to see if I set it correctly. It's not a good user experience to choose this setting but then not having indicated what influence it has and which setting I used to post.
Anyways, lemmy is great nonetheless.
- •
- feddit.de
- •
- 1M
- •
also if you wear top left with all black skinny clothes and turtleneck you'll be a special kind of hipster.
I as a user hate it, it's really annoying to find a video that seems interesting or by a creator I like and it's there, but not available yet. I don't really get the benefit, even for the content creator.
Many right-wing parties in other parts of the world are like them.
They are dangerous.
lmao what an idiot
cross-posted from: https://feddit.de/post/427796
> This is the second try (original post: https://feddit.de/post/426890) of me trying to get an answer, this time I'll be more specific of what I am thinking to do. I thought a more generalized question would be enough. Sorry for that.
>
> A peertube server needs lots of storage. Many of the videos will hardly get any views. Storage space on a vps is pretty expensive, storage space in general isn't cheap. So my thought was to
>
> have a disk at home (maybe external disk on a raspberry pi) and a VPS.
>
> The VPS only has a very limited amount of storage, but is otherwise totally able to run peertube well. So why not have a virtual file system on the VPS, which looks like it has the size of the HDD and it uses a specified amount of the vps storage for caching. So if someone watches a popular part of a popular video, the vps can serve the video content from the local disk. If someone wants to watch the video that nobody ever watches, it's not a problem since the uplink from home can easily deliver that as well, without the video taking the precious storage.
> Block caching would be best, since file caching wouldn't be ideal with video files being really big in some cases. So a very long video would fill the cache, even if only parts of it are needed.
>
> The remote storage doesn't need to be from home of course, could be cheap cloud storage. I know that peertube works with s3, but it will only move transcoded videos into a bucket and then serve them directly from there. I don't want that from home, it would also not use the upload performance of the VPS for popular videos.
>
> Any thoughts? Good idea or not?
>
> I have worked with bcache in the past and was always very impressed with the performance, I think my scenario could really work.
This is the second try (original post: https://feddit.de/post/426890) of me trying to get an answer, this time I'll be more specific of what I am thinking to do. I thought a more generalized question would be enough. Sorry for that.
A peertube server needs lots of storage. Many of the videos will hardly get any views. Storage space on a vps is pretty expensive, storage space in general isn't cheap. So my thought was to
have a disk at home (maybe external disk on a raspberry pi) and a VPS.
The VPS only has a very limited amount of storage, but is otherwise totally able to run peertube well. So why not have a virtual file system on the VPS, which looks like it has the size of the HDD and it uses a specified amount of the vps storage for caching. So if someone watches a popular part of a popular video, the vps can serve the video content from the local disk. If someone wants to watch the video that nobody ever watches, it's not a problem since the uplink from home can easily deliver that as well, without the video taking the precious storage.
Block caching would be best, since file caching wouldn't be ideal with video files being really big in some cases. So a very long video would fill the cache, even if only parts of it are needed.
The remote storage doesn't need to be from home of course, could be cheap cloud storage. I know that peertube works with s3, but it will only move transcoded videos into a bucket and then serve them directly from there. I don't want that from home, it would also not use the upload performance of the VPS for popular videos.
Any thoughts? Good idea or not?
I have worked with bcache in the past and was always very impressed with the performance, I think my scenario could really work.
Oh weren't they one of the automakers who thought hydrogen was the fuel of the future?? xD
Hey I am looking for a way to have a network folder on a vps that uses a configurable amount of local storage for caching.
WHAT KILLED THE CRABS?
The official story is something like “a billion snow crabs disappeared.”
If that sounds fishy to you, keep reading. Let’s dive into the ecology, oceanography, & geopolitical history of the Bering Sea.
A science thread on crabs, corruption, & collapse: 🦀
We just had a hilarious jokester post nazi spam. If someone had reported instead of downvoted the posts in the memes sub I would have seen it earlier, since I mod there.
So if you see something that obv violates the rules, please report. It makes it easier for me and others to be notified.
This way fewer people have to see the bad stuff :)
hmm I would only buy them from bike makers.
Also let’s hope they produce it in better quality than their laptops.