- randomaside ( @randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 25•10 months ago
It’s been an unsupportable business model from the beginning. Other than android, everything Google makes is easily replaceable by some other product. They don’t have a monopoly like any of their competition that will easily sustain them. I honestly don’t believe the majority of Google Engineers actually do anything innovative anymore as most of those people left the company when their pet projects were shut down in the first round of cost cutting measures (around the time Google became Alphabet).
- lud ( @lud@lemm.ee ) 26•10 months ago
They pretty much have a monopoly with YouTube.
- pixelscript ( @pixelscript@lemmy.ml ) English12•10 months ago
Supposedly a deeply unprofitable one. Which is a huge chunk of why no real competition has surfaced.
It’s one thing to set up a proverbial store with prices so low you choke out the competition. It’s another thing to essentially pay your customers to come in, either by literally paying them or by providing a service that they pay below actual cost for.
- bigkahuna1986 ( @bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml ) 7•10 months ago
Supposedly a deeply unprofitable one.
That’s probably why it’s getting enshittified so quickly.
- Kidplayer_666 ( @Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee ) 4•10 months ago
And search
- lud ( @lud@lemm.ee ) 8•10 months ago
Yeah, but that one is replaceable if people want too.
- Kidplayer_666 ( @Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee ) 5•10 months ago
Everything is replaceable if people want to. The problem is the inertia it takes to substitute it
- lud ( @lud@lemm.ee ) 8•10 months ago
YouTube is really hard to replace without the money of a multi billion company.
Video is hard and attracting creators is even harder.
- Kidplayer_666 ( @Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee ) 2•10 months ago
So is a good search engine. As much as I love DuckDuckGo and daily drive it the results are much worse than google’s
- lud ( @lud@lemm.ee ) 5•10 months ago
No, you can switch to a different search engine right now and the results will be perfectly fine. I use DDG exclusively.
What video platform can you switch to that has even remotely close to the amount of content as YouTube? (Pornhub doesn’t count)
- narp ( @narp@feddit.de ) 2•10 months ago
Copilot/Bing Search might put a big dent in that in the future. People will just ask an AI instead of “googling”.
- meteorswarm ( @meteorswarm@beehaw.org ) 5•10 months ago
These layoffs didn’t happen because Google is out of money. It’s insanely profitable.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Google just confirmed to The Verge that it’s eliminated “a few hundred” roles in each of these divisions, meaning Google has confirmed layoffs of around a thousand employees on Wednesday alone, if we use a reasonable definition of “few”.
We asked Google spokesperson Courtenay Mencini to say if this was the complete and total number of job cuts in this round of layoffs, but she stopped replying at that point, only confirming existing layoff reports at 9to5Google and Semafor.
The New York Times reported on the engineering team layoffs too.
When we spoke to Mencini earlier this evening about the Google hardware layoffs, she did not mention the other layoffs — but did write that “a number of our teams made changes to become more efficient and work better” and that “some teams are continuing to make these kinds of organizational changes, which include some role eliminations globally.”
If so, though, it won’t work: The Verge is among the news outlets that takes a hard line against planted information, and we pride ourselves on finding the bigger picture.
Parent firm Alphabet employed 182,381 employees as of September 30th, 2023, so roughly a thousand job cuts would only be around half a percent of the company’s total.
The original article contains 360 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 43%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
- Jagermo ( @Jagermo@feddit.de ) 2•10 months ago
“Same procedure as last year?”
“Same procedure as every year!”