bleistift2 ( @bleistift2@feddit.de ) English25•1 year agoEngineers now: We built an airport, 9 years behind schedule and at 233% the cost.
We are rebuilding a train station at (currently) 366% the planned cost and an estimated delivery time of 200% the original estimate, into rock that might swell when in contact with water and heave the station out of the ground, in order to decrease the station’s capacity by 17%
tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺 ( @tryptaminev@feddit.de ) 30•1 year agoThis is not the engineers fault though.
It is highly political projects, politicians offloaded their old friends and competitiors onto the boeards and other functions and in the case of the airport major planning was undertaken by a guy who is a technical drawer and not an engineer.
Most of these fuck ups could have been prevent, if the project management was done by project managers with an engineering background and if the owners side would have been represented by peoplewith a technical backgrounds.
Source: i have worked in civil engineering for public projects. We wasted 50% of the time explaining Politicians and MBA bros C-levels why they can’t start by building the roof and why replanning half the stuff is a bad idea, when we are already on the market with bids for contractors.
lockhart ( @lockhart@lemmy.ml ) 5•1 year agoestimates are just that, a guess
SinAdjetivos ( @SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org ) 3•1 year agoFor healthy working relationships and solid infrastructure you under-promise and over-deliver.
For maximal profit and sustainable business models you over-promise and under-deliver.
1993_toyota_camry ( @1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org ) 2•1 year agoThe company that under-promises won’t win the bid, though. Unfortunately the norm now is to overpromise, and then squeeze as many extra fees and concessions out of the project as possible.
There’s also a culture of contractors vs engineers where limits willingness to work together to find solutions. “not my fault”.
SinAdjetivos ( @SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org ) 1•1 year agoExactly, hence the root of the problem the original meme is getting at…
interolivary ( @interolivary@beehaw.org ) 1•1 year agoWell sure that’s fundamentally true, but really doesn’t give any sort of accurate picture of how estimates are done any more than “humans are just collections of cells” does, and anybody who does estimates without using some sort of data as the basis and is purely guessing is doing it wrong as fuck.
It’s not like we have no idea how long certain tasks have taken in the past, or what affects how long something will take.
jaschen ( @jaschen@lemm.ee ) 14•1 year agoI can’t even build python scripts…
You can lie on Internet.
jaschen ( @jaschen@lemm.ee ) 7•1 year agoI can’t even lie on the internet. I’m worthless.
chicken ( @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 13•1 year agoProgrammers mostly aren’t really engineers and that’s ok. I don’t want to be an engineer.
thequickben ( @thequickben@beehaw.org ) 2•1 year agoI personally disagree. Took 3 years of Electrical Engineering courses in college but finished with a B.S in Computer Science. Both are valid engineering disciplines, the only thing lacking on the computer side are standardized licensing tests and an oversight body. Software engineers have to build software that can affect life and death too, but somehow we don’t have as much regulation in the US which is super odd to me.
chicken ( @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 1•1 year agoWhat makes something engineering vs not? Personally what I do doesn’t feel like engineering because I imagine engineering as being about following a particular process and doing things in a very cautious and structured way, where programming is normally way more chaotic.
madkarlsson ( @madkarlsson@beehaw.org ) 2•1 year agoYour notion of an engineer is correct in a wide sense
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineer
The fact that you feel programming is not that makes me sad. But likely dependent on what software and what you work with. For example, if you build software for NASA or Baxter and dialysis machines and the likes, you’ll get fired fast for not being structured. Working for Elon Musk and Twitter… Well…
chicken ( @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 1•1 year agoI don’t think it has to be a sad thing. Without that sort of structure you can be more imaginative, which has many advantages. Again, I don’t want to be an engineer, I feel that would suck all the joy out of it and just isn’t my style. That isn’t to say an engineering approach to programming doesn’t exist or isn’t useful/necessary in some cases, but I would say it isn’t the norm and probably shouldn’t be.
madkarlsson ( @madkarlsson@beehaw.org ) 1•1 year agoI personally think it’s a bit of a fallacy to equal structure with less creativity.
Look at Calatrava https://duckduckgo.com/?q=calatrava&t=fpas&iax=images&ia=images
Further, you can’t design something like the Burj Khalifa without creativity
Maybe the line goes where you are risking peoples life or not, maybe somewhere else. It still makes me sad that you equal programming with chaos. But that is very context driven. The drive for new software, new interfaces, new tech overall naturally breeds less oversight and less structure naturally ofc. But it doesn’t have to be that way, nor should it be if you ask me
Cowbee [he/they] ( @Cowbee@lemmy.ml ) 11•1 year agoDo you… do you think we don’t have Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, or Computer Engineers anymore?
RattusInox ( @RattusInox@kbin.social ) 5•1 year agoYou mean “I ask ChatGPT how to write two line Python scripts”?
HubertManne ( @HubertManne@kbin.social ) 4•1 year agosome countries actually define what an engineer is much like doctors.
drcabbage ( @drcabbage@lemmy.ml ) 2•1 year agoHey, that’s not fair! Sometimes I write 3 lines.
dmalteseknight ( @dmalteseknight@programming.dev ) English3•1 year agoComments don’t count
RattusInox ( @RattusInox@kbin.social ) 1•1 year agoYou mean “I ask ChatGPT how to write two line Python scripts”?