- cross-posted to:
- technology
- cross-posted to:
- technology
You must log in or register to comment.
One extremely important factor that this article neglects to address: Valve is a private company - it’s not publicly traded in Wall Street. That is the reason Steam has remained the best in the business; it’s not beholden to shareholders’ short-sighted meddling. It’s also the reason Steam is effectively immune to enshittification.
Valve has avoided many of the same anti-consumer moves as other tech and gaming giants, likely due to its smaller size, status as a non-public company, and the long-time leadership of Gabe Newell and other executives. Valve won’t stay that way forever—the company is not immune to the pressures of capitalism, and there are already examples of anti-consumer behavior.
Valve is not immune to enshittification, and it has already happened on some level with minimal current Mac support, facilitating gambling through item trades, etc.
Valve doesn’t support Mac because Apple doesn’t support gaming. They’ve made it abundantly clear that they have no interest (outside of iOS) for decades.
Speaking of shitty companies, Apple is top-tier shit, and no one should be buying their hardware anyway.
It’s also the reason Steam is effectively immune to enshittification.
1000% disagree. There are endless shitty private companies. Valve is only not shitty because of Gabe. And also they’re not completely free of shit.
Their 30% fees are insane and they pretty much invented microtransactions.
I do hope to see more competition in the Linux gaming space. It’s not good long term to fully rely on Valve for everything.
The article makes some good points. Most people downvoting it probably just see a title that attacks their favourite game distribution platform, if there even is such a thing.
Personally, I treat Steam like a rental service, because that’s what it is. Meaning I exclusively “buy” games on Steam at deep 80-90% discounts. So, when the enshittification inevitably hits the fan, I can jump ship without feeling like I’m loosing too much.
I’ll just link this reply. They lost me when they said “The lock-in effect with Steam is so great that [Epic] giving games away for free is not putting a sizable dent in Valve’s dominance.”
It doesn’t matter that Epic is giving away games that only run on a platform I don’t use. They won’t get my money until they get their heads out of their asses about Linux.
EDIT: Yeah the link says pretty much the same things (and more) than I did below.
I think it says more about Epic’s launcher and sales tactics than about Valve’s dominance. I mean, up to a certain point you can compensate your inferior product with a lower price point but if the trade-off is too high, then even giving something out for free doesn’t help. Epic’s launcher has been quite bad without any clear development in my eyes for a long time, and I can as well relate to the other commenter about not being able to use it natively on Linux. It’s just not something worth a few saved euros to put up with.
I do wonder what’s the Steam users’ demography nowadays. Are there so many adults who earn a decent salary that they can afford actually paying for their games and enjoy a working platform (Steam) instead of saving a buck and losing their hair on the rare occasion they have the time to play something? That can be a tough crowd to lure in with some occasional free games.