- cross-posted to:
- technologie@jlai.lu
- programming@programming.dev
Exiting news for the lady bird browser. https://ladybird.org/
- moreeni ( @moreeni@lemm.ee ) 119•3 months ago
TL;DR: The Ladybird browser, which was written from scratch and aims to be an alternative to corporate-backed browser, now has a non-profit organisation behind it. Also, it got additional funding of 1 million dollars. The end.
- Telorand ( @Telorand@reddthat.com ) 44•3 months ago
Ah, now I can be excited for them and move on with my day. I get that video presentations can be great for feature releases that need visual aids, but I don’t want to sit through a video for details that can be summed up in two sentences.
- LeFantome ( @LeFantome@programming.dev ) 3•3 months ago
Then don’t watch it. I have spent more time now reading this complaint on Lemmy than I have watching videos that were not worth my time.
The guy that made this video had a few minutes to make a high-engagement video I guess and no time to write a low-engagement press release. That was his choice.
Your choice is to watch it or not. He does not your views. Videos do better regardless of your opinion.
I actually agree with you but I am just sick of reading this comment on every video posted. Use tech to transcribe it yourself or just don’t watch. Stop making me read this complaint. Unlike video, I have to waste time reading before I realize what you are saying.
- Iapar ( @Iapar@feddit.org ) 12•3 months ago
Then don’t read the comment…
- LeFantome ( @LeFantome@programming.dev ) 2•3 months ago
Well, you clearly did not read mine. At least, not the part where I addressed exactly that. I do love these opportunities to brush with genius.
- Iapar ( @Iapar@feddit.org ) 3•3 months ago
Nope. I read until you did what you criticized, decided it was wasting my time and stopped.
- Telorand ( @Telorand@reddthat.com ) 4•3 months ago
The complaining will continue until post quality improves.
- LeFantome ( @LeFantome@programming.dev ) 1•3 months ago
The reason videos are so inefficient for him is because he has to take so much time on each one to complain about it being a video.
- MonkeMischief ( @MonkeMischief@lemmy.today ) 3•3 months ago
Thanks, this was hugely helpful. For some reason half the comments here made it about politics.
Interested to see where this new software actually goes.
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English1•3 months ago
This is very exciting
- quaff ( @quaff@lemmy.ca ) English102•3 months ago
Neat. But it’s kind of concerning to see yet another OSS project hitch it’s community resourcing to Discord.
- SavvyWolf ( @savvywolf@pawb.social ) English34•3 months ago
Yeah, it’s a bit at odds with their “free from corporate influence” angle. Absolutely no reason to not use Matrix.
- LeFantome ( @LeFantome@programming.dev ) 24•3 months ago
I actually do not like Discord and wish they did not use it. That said “absolutely no reason not to use Matrix” is clearly an objectively untrue statement.
Andreas has always been very pragmatic. He will choose the tools he likes best.
- XNX ( @xnx@slrpnk.net ) 7•3 months ago
How does the make it non free from corporate influence. The hate boner towards discord is getting ridiculous sometimes. Yeah it sucks to use a repo thats not googleable and not open source bur discord is an objectively better user experience than matrix
- youmaynotknow ( @jjlinux@lemmy.ml ) 10•3 months ago
We see these things differently. I would argue that Matrix clients are better organized than Discord. That said, not only is Discord a privacy nightmare, but ilthe interface is only pseudo-organized at best.
- toastal ( @toastal@lemmy.ml ) 5•3 months ago
All the Matrix clients are buggy using far too many resources & the protocol is slow as balls about joining new rooms while being wasteful about data duplication for throwaway bits of text/multimedia. I don’t think eventual consistency is the right model for chat & following Slack & Discord’s model is the way.
- OsrsNeedsF2P ( @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ) 1•3 months ago
Slack & Discord both use eventual consistency?
Btw I agree with you that Discord is better UX than Matrix, but your comment doesn’t make much sense
- toastal ( @toastal@lemmy.ml ) 1•3 months ago
Sorry for clarity. The eventual consistency model is a result of wanting decentralization for Slack/Telegram/Discord’s design of thinking the entire history needs to be saved for chat rather than seen as ephemeral (which allows for better search & resilience, but at a major cost to storage, but also a knock-on effect of folks treating chat as permanent which is why we have huge, cut-off information silos on these chat platforms that the rest of the net can’t index & often trawling the search is difficult so the repeated questions/answers are common since a simple web search doesn’t yield good results). When you take away the concept that all text & attachments need to be seen from origin til the end of time, you would never bother in all the work of cloning the entire history & reassembling it on every server listening to the conversation. …Which is why many chat protocols forgo the more then enough history to keep you up to speed with a conversation & structured forums + feeds used to be the primary way to ask questions & make announcements (where simple programs could parse the data instead of needing gobs of natural language processing for chat soup when it is pulling multiple duties).
- Fonzie! ( @lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network ) 8•3 months ago
How does the make it non free from corporate influence.
Do they require Discord and depend on it? Yes.
Is Discord corporate? Yes.
Are they then still free from corporate influence? Nope. H Simply put, if Discord suddenly implemented weird rules the Ladybird devs would have to comply with, they’d simply have to follow suit or break their main communication channel. - Fonzie! ( @lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network ) 4•3 months ago
How does the make it non free from corporate influence.
Do they require Discord and depend on it? Yes.
Is Discord corporate? Yes.
Are they then still free from corporate influence? Nope.Simply put, if Discord suddenly implemented weird rules the Ladybird devs would have to comply with, they’d simply have to follow suit or break their main communication channel.
- GenderNeutralBro ( @GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org ) English33•3 months ago
We are targeting a first Alpha release for early adopters in 2026.
I will watch this from afar with great interest.
- BB_C ( @BB_C@programming.dev ) 29•3 months ago
A reminder that the Servo project has resumed active development since the start of 2023, and is making good progress every month.
If you’re looking for a serious in-progress effort to create a new open, safe, performant, independent, and fully-featured web engine, that’s the one you should be keeping an eye on.
It won’t be easy trying to catch up to continuously evolving and changing web standards, but that’s the only effort with a chance.
- LeFantome ( @LeFantome@programming.dev ) 16•3 months ago
Though I am a big Rust fan, I think Ladybird is evolving fast enough that my money is on Ladybird to become a true daily driver first. The biggest obstacle to that is JavaScript as Ladybird still uses its homegrown engine ( very slow ) and Servo is integrating SpiderMonkey.
Ladybird just got a million dollar shot in the arm. We will see what becomes of that.
Despite the Mozilla origins, I do not think you can say Servo is backed by Google. The claim from Ladybird is that it is the only browser not financially supported by Google.
I would say that Servo is corporate backed at this point and Ladybird still is not ( backed by donations only ) but with large donations by a single donor, we will see if Ladybird is able to stay completely independent over time.
- T (they/she) ( @Templa@beehaw.org ) 26•3 months ago
I used to follow Ladybird/SerenityOS stuff but their takes on “political stuff” is just… too bad.
- cygnus ( @cygnus@lemmy.ca ) 24•3 months ago
I wonder what’s in it for Shopify. This seems like an odd thing for them to sponsor, or a very expensive FU to Google.
- LeFantome ( @LeFantome@programming.dev ) 14•3 months ago
Well, it could be genuine altruism. But I doubt a web totally controlled by Google sounds good to a company that relies on the semi-open web for its business.
This is a bit like Valve liking Linux I imagine.
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English3•3 months ago
Not to mention they have been burned by Google. They were one of the ones pushing for JPEG XL.
- Angel Mountain ( @angelmountain@feddit.nl ) 7•3 months ago
#1 sponsor is Shopify, how does that affect the indepentness?
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English5•3 months ago
Why are we shouting?
As long as it doesn’t become a way for Shopify to shovel ads and collect data it isn’t a problem. We will watch with great interest
- alvanrahimli ( @alvanrahimli@lemmy.ml ) English7•3 months ago
Ladybird is extremely amazing project. Andreas is a good person, with great community around him. The only thing I didn’t like is the new logo - it is very meta-ish. Looks very corporative, and doesn’t really resemble browser :(
- Undearius ( @Undearius@lemmy.ca ) English6•3 months ago
This is the first I’m hearing of Ladybird. Looks really interesting and glad to see there are more options for browsers coming
- Railison ( @Railison@aussie.zone ) English5•3 months ago
We need more browser engines, especially those that are under NFP ownership. WebKit and Chromium have become too dominant.
- dino ( @dino@discuss.tchncs.de ) English4•3 months ago
For sure going to use a webbrowser from some random programmers/organizations.
- stuckgum ( @stuckgum@lemmy.ml ) 4•3 months ago
Ah, the famed non-profit Shopify.
- LeFantome ( @LeFantome@programming.dev ) 3•3 months ago
I am still trying to decide what I think about the Ladybird / SerenityOS split.
Short-term, this is going to make it a lot easier for Ladybird to make progress. So good.
Long-term, I feel like a lot of the values that Andreas used to express about SerenityOS have been compromised.
I very much liked the, everything from scratch and complete harmony within and complete control over our whole stack idea that came with the mono-repo.
I also thought that the energy from Ladybird was greatly contributing to SerenityOS. That is lost now, as is their chief architect, technical steward, and community organizer.
Much of the low-level performance work that went into Ladybird benefited the whole OS. Did SerenityOS even post a monthly update on YouTube this month? The community engagement has already been dampened.
SerenityOS was certainly benefiting from the networking, codec, and image format work. The biggest impact will obviously be the loss of what was emerging as an amazing native web browser. They cannot even use Ladybird now due to the reliance on so many third-party components. I guess it forks from where it was?
How is error handling done in Ladybird now? It was beautifully consistent before. What now?
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English2•3 months ago
I don’t think there really is a need or use case for Serenity OS outside of a hobby project. However, having a new web engine would be great for the open web. I just hope they take privacy seriously.
- Prunebutt ( @Prunebutt@slrpnk.net ) 2•3 months ago
Godspeed to them.