- cross-posted to:
- memes@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
You laugh now, but at least you could turn the dialogue up over the music by adjusting the balance. I’d almost take this over not being able to hear a damn thing anyone is saying in modern TV audio.
Check if your TV is playing the surround track. Modern TVs are hell-bent on serving you the multi channel audio, regardless of it’s being played through the built in stereo only speakers.
Surround is mixed for high dynamic, talking is ‘talking volume’ and loud shit is indeed loud. In contrast stereo is pretty much normalized, so you can here everything at moderate volume.
I vaguely recall there being a stereo record needle explanation for this.
So part of it was to be backwards compatible with some mono record players, that might be the needle explanation. Another part was how the mixer wanted to use the two channels. Are the channels left and right, or two mono channels of vocals and instrumentals. Lastly it was because mixers could do that when just a short time before they couldn’t. They were artists who were experimenting with a new medium. It wasn’t just one reason, and it wasn’t for very long really. It’s just a lot of music was recorded during that time.
When done effectively, it does sound awesome that way. My buddy and I (both making music) talk quite a bit about strategic use of similar techniques but subtler when we mix music today.
I’ve a few “learn the violin” CDs like that. Solo instrument on one channel, band/orchestra on the other. As you get better at playing it, change the balance.
Not so essential for classical music, since music notation pretty much marks exactly what you should play, but great for folk or jazz when there’s a lot of “unwritten” style knowledge that you need to learn.