This is bullshit, it defined but didn’t even use the continuous functions 🍇and 🍍.
golang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out
IMSA kid?
🍊 isnt a metric dumbass, its an orange
But what if it was grown in Europe?
Naranja
Americans will use anything other than metric
“sup” without a “\” belongs-to-set symbol \[ and \]
scrödinger’s TeX
Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce 🍇 and🍍?
I can answer the question. No.
He’s right.
🍊🍊🍊🍊
By using 🍊 to rate how good this post is(out of 5), i made it a metric for how good this post is
I am waiting for someone to actually answer this
Oh, I expected it to be some unsolved problem.
Thanks for the link. I expected there would be a problem with triangle inequality but didn’t want to do the actual proving 😅
The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.