Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) MA to PoliticsEnglish · 3 years ago

White House unveils plan to make insurers cover mental health care

www.statnews.com

external-link
message-square
17
link
fedilink
218
external-link

White House unveils plan to make insurers cover mental health care

www.statnews.com

alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) MA to PoliticsEnglish · 3 years ago
message-square
17
link
fedilink
A White House plan could help end decades of whack-a-mole between regulators and insurance companies over covering mental health and addiction treatment.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • sin_free_for_00_days ( sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 years ago

    You know what the data says would have a big impact on mental illness? Fixing the wealth inequality that’s destroying the country.

    • tokyorock ( tokyorock@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yeah, I’d say stress due to financial hardship and dread due to climate change are primary causes poor mental health, but I don’t see politicians doing anything meaningful for these.

  • SomeDude ( ProcurementCat@feddit.de ) deleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 years ago

    No, that can’t be, all those online commenters tell me that democrats are beholden to “big money” and this move would hurt insurance companies.

    • SkepticElliptic ( SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      Big hospital near me removed the only mental health floor in theicounty this year. Mental healthcare just isn’t profitable. The big hospital in my county has a 6 month waiting list to see someone.

      The private practice guys don’t take most insurance.

      • bermuda ( bermuda@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        Can confirm about private practice. My insurers mental health website was severely out of date so I had to spend hours upon hours on hold with every private practice in a 20 mile radius to find one that took my insurance. Still ended up on a 3 months long wait-list before I was finally seen.

    • Steve ( Steve@compuverse.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      Not really. They’ll just raise their rates.

      • MJBrune ( MJBrune@beehaw.org ) deleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        deleted by creator

    • rambaroo ( rambaroo@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’m confused, do you actually believe that Democrats are not beholden to big money?

      • SomeDude ( ProcurementCat@feddit.de ) deleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yes, I am. Because the democratic party base has chosen a guy to represent them and become president who, together with his party, mass pardoned Marihuana convicts and capped insulin prices to 35$ for private insurants and Medicare recipients and have increased the minimum wage every time it was increased and raised the federal minimum wage to 15$ in the first week of Biden in office and cancelled 66 billion in student loans already and cancelled 10k student loans for everybody and expanded gun safety laws for the first time in 30 years and banned oil and gas price gouging and provided millions for baby formula during the shortage and increased veterans benefits and gave Americans abortion rights in the first place and killed the Keystone XL pipeline and vetoed EPA regulation rollbacks and got you fuckers $1.400 COVID relief checks and expanded unemployment benefits for 9.7 million people and got the fucking Covid vaccine going and ended transgender discrimination in the goverment and protects abortion access and ended family separation

        And a party that’s actually beholden to “big money” blocks and votes against all of that. Which Republicans did.

  • fizgigtiznalkie ( fizgigtiznalkie@lemmynsfw.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 years ago

    Sounds like a good thing but they’ll probably just raise our premiums 50%

    • uphillbothways ( uphillbothways@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Unfortunately, private insurance only makes money when it isn’t used.

  • raccoona_nongrata ( raccoona_nongrata@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • the_itsb (she/her) ( the_itsb@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Am I the only person who keeps meeting medical professionals and support staff who don’t realize that insurance is unhelpful in some situations? The only insurance with premiums my family can afford has deductibles and co-pays/etc so high that we only ever paid premiums when we had it, we literally never once were able to also afford to go get care. Once the mandate dropped and we didn’t have to pay premiums anymore, we could use that money to self-pay our appointments.

      Sure, yes, if I get cancer or my husband is hit by a truck, we are fucked. But also, if we go bankrupt paying for insurance we can’t afford to use, I’m gonna be pretty fucked for that cancer anyway because I can’t afford the co-pays etc. Idk what part of “I can’t afford to pay premiums and co-pays until I potentially reach a $1.5k out of pocket maximum,” is so hard to understand.

      I helped host a local protest to raise awareness about Single-Payer (anybody else remember SPAN, the Single-Payer Action Network?) back in 2004, and holy fucking shit that was almost 20 years ago.

    • barsoap ( barsoap@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      It might if y’all get your asses up and create some mutuals.

      Historically speaking the German public insurance system started out with union-associated mutual funds, Bismarck didn’t so much create the system but brought it under state control and made having insurance mandatory because it was macroeconomically sound and otherwise beneficial for his conservative (as in Monarchist) ass: Result was less votes for the Socdems which Bismarck liked, more state control which he also liked, and less people emigrating to the US where you had more chances, but also no safety net whatsoever, which he also liked.

      To this day German insurers are practically mutuals – as they’re public-law corporations we don’t own them (noone does) but we’re not customers but members, vote for their boards, and noone is siphoning off profit. They’re essentially like municipalities in a sense: Providing service and you’re a “citizen” of at least one (all German territory is covered by municipalities so you don’t get around that if you want to live somewhere), you get to vote in how they’re run. One thing you’ll want to also copy is to have a mutual for those mutuals so to speak, to transfer funds from insurers who insure lots of rich healthy people to insurers who insure lots of poor ill people.


      But on the legal side more importantly you have to severely limit co-pays. One thing that absolutely must happen is that all kinds of preventive checkup and care that avoids worse is covered by the policy no questions asked. That’s literally saving the insurers money.

      Over here co-pays are very limited and more of the “yeah we don’t want you to go to a doctor to get a prescription to get 1.50 over the counter drugs for free” kind, as well as some modest contributions to hospital stays, on the order of 5 Euro a day “you’d otherwise have spent it on food which you’re getting here”. All that has yearly caps, affordable ones. Generally speaking if people are paying for stuff out of pocket then it’s to get services that insurance doesn’t cover, like single rooms, or fancy treatments, where you’ll only pay the price difference to what’s medically necessary. In a nutshell if you want gold teeth you’ll have to buy the gold, but the insurer is still going to cover the work.

  • SeaJ ( SeaJ@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’m sure Republicans will be very supportive of this since gun violence is all due to mental health issues.

  • bricklove ( bricklove@midwest.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 years ago

    Nice, though if I lose my job and insurance due to the paralyzing anxiety I have regarding losing my job and insurance, this doesn’t really make a difference

  • Reva ( Reva@startrek.website ) deleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    deleted by creator

  • AllahFucksKids ( AllahFucksKids@fedia.io ) BannedBannedBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Removed by mod

    • TheDankHold ( TheDankHold@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Mental healthcare gets held back by people like you who think their ignorance is more valid than the knowledge of people that actually study these phenomenon from the goal of understanding it.

      I hope you have enough self awareness to realize you’re allowing conservatives to sabotage your principles through wedge issue scapegoats that are misrepresented.

    • Rodsterlings_cig ( Rodsterlings_cig@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Lets not stoop to their level, no reason to strawman mental health coverage, which is much needed in this country.

  • TwoGems ( TwoGems@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Rabbits

Politics

politics

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Where possible, post the original source of information.
    • If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
  • Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
  • Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
  • Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
  • Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Socialism

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 106 users / day
  • 377 users / week
  • 621 users / month
  • 1.43K users / 6 months
  • 2.41K local subscribers
  • 11.7K subscribers
  • 4.19K Posts
  • 22.9K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • Gaywallet (they/it) ( Gaywallet@beehaw.org ) 
  • JuBe ( JuBe@beehaw.org ) 
  • JCPhoenix ( JCPhoenix@beehaw.org ) 
  • Gil (he/they) ( kalanggam@beehaw.org ) 
  • circularfish ( circularfish@beehaw.org ) 
  • knokelmaat ( knokelmaat@beehaw.org ) 
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code