- cross-posted to:
- opensource@kbin.social
- linux@lemmy.ml
Tartas1995 ( @Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de ) 5•2 years agoExtremely misleading title. Many people will think the code will be made private but instead someone is making the company private. Taking a company private isn’t that bad inherently. Also that guy owns 77% already. Even with it being public, he makes the calls anyway. If you ask me, he sees in red hats decisions a market opportunity to take their spot.
ursakhiin ( @ursakhiin@beehaw.org ) 1•2 years agoTo your point, every other comment seems to be about the idea of SUSE closing it’s source code.
Tartas1995 ( @Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•2 years agoWhen I was in 9th grade, I worked in a company that sold office material and we had random people working in to get their driver’s license. That is when I learned, people can read but won’t read. Not even only a sign.
I am not surprised.
Tischkante ( @Tischkante@discuss.tchncs.de ) 4•2 years agoClosed SUSE
dko1905 ( @dko1905@discuss.tchncs.de ) 2•2 years agoWell, it’s about SUSE not OpenSUSE.
Rolivers ( @Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de ) 2•2 years agoEnshittification won’t take long now.
Laitinlok ( @Laitinlok@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•2 years agoNot good
Double_A ( @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•2 years agoThis is a good thing though, since they now can focus on longterm visions and investments, instead of having to justify everything to the shareholders which want profits in every quarter…