I like the part where they point out that writers probably have more leverage than they think about having a say - but then maybe many writers don’t consider the ebook side of things when thinking about getting their work published.

It’s obvious that ‘they’ are out to demonise IA as something like Pirate Bay whereas it really, really isn’t. Aside from the massive amount of obscure reference material, I found BBC documentaries on there from the 80s about some history which is otherwise unobtainable. I can understand if there’s some legal points which need to be worked out between both sides in order to keep the site going… but that obviously isn’t what the publishers are going for.

I think they’re talking about for sale doctrine in the physical world not carrying over to archive.orgs interpretation for digital content.