- cross-posted to:
- globalnews@vlemmy.net
Curious_Canid ( @Curious_Canid@kbin.social ) 22•1 year agoIt’s worth pushing for this. Most of what little privacy protection we get these days is a side effect of laws in the EU. It would be nice to actually have some of those legal protection here as well.
admiralteal ( @admiralteal@kbin.social ) 9•1 year agoOne step closer to banning this kind of databrokerage as an industry.
exohuman ( @exohuman@kbin.social ) 14•1 year agoYay, we could get the same protections Europeans already have. I hope it passes.
towerful ( @towerful@beehaw.org ) 19•1 year agoThis would be great, because it would “validate” GDPR.
Data protection requests would be more likely to be planned-for and succeed if users didn’t have to say/prove they were an EU citizen.
Certainly, as a UK citizen who has these protections, but not specifically GDPR, it can be difficult leverage these rights.
More countries adopting these kind of laws will hopefully resolve into a global standard of “right to be forgotten”, as long as it doesn’t collapse into an XKCD#927 scenario (https://xkcd.com/927) ahriboy ( @ahriboy@kbin.social ) 5•1 year agoThe California Consumer Protection Act could be useful for other states to make their own equivalents. Or push the Federal Government to make one.
Melpomene ( @Melpomene@kbin.social ) 3•1 year agoA number of US states went live with similar laws at the beginning of this year, and they do seem to be effective.
artisanrox ( @artisanrox@kbin.social ) 14•1 year agoRepublicans will vote this down claiming it uses the wrong bathroom
NecoArcKbinAccount ( @NecoArcKbinAccount@kbin.social ) 11•1 year agoTo be honest this doesn’t involve any “culture war” dumbassery so unless Fox starts spewing about how the bill is woke and will turn your kids gay I don’t think anyone outside of the usual suspects would vote against it.
Then again the GOP will make the most innocuous thing into a political shitshow, so who knows.
artisanrox ( @artisanrox@kbin.social ) 5•1 year agoThey write their own useful, not-crappy bills and then vote against them all the time.
They don’t need any culture war talking points, they just want everything broken and everyone miserable.
admiralteal ( @admiralteal@kbin.social ) 5•1 year agoUnironically right to be forgotten stuff is a major benefit to a person who’s gone through social transition because it does things like let them get rid of their dead name on the internet.
HTTP_404_NotFound ( @xtremeownage@lemmyonline.com ) 10•1 year agoThe uh, bipartisan part, kinda hints that both republicans and democrats are pushing it.
Let’s make this topic about being able to have better control over your data, rather then pitching sides against each other.
Finally some good stuff, though lobbyists will most likely never let it pass (or drum up some bs about how it “could delete evidence” in some crime case)
Melpomene ( @Melpomene@kbin.social ) 2•1 year agoI’ve been reading through the bill and I have concerns. The bill requires data brokers to register with the commission and they store PII sufficient to identify an individual. Because the registered brokers must report back that they’ve removed the data, it does give the commission an awful lot of data on people’s online activities. Not everyone wants their data linked that way. But as long as I can still do things the hard way, I’m not opposed.
defeater ( @defeater@vlemmy.net ) 4•1 year agoIt’s so hard to be enthusiastic about news like this these days.
FfaerieOxide ( @FfaerieOxide@kbin.social ) 3•1 year agoOn some GDPR shit?