How to Hide a $2 Trillion Antitrust Trial
www.thebignewsletter.com
We did an analysis of the Google antitrust trial. Last week, over half of the trial was held behind closed doors because the judge, Amit Mehta, is deferring to Google on the need for secrecy.

We did an analysis of the Google antitrust trial. Last week, over half of the trial was held behind closed doors because the judge, Amit Mehta, is deferring to Google on the need for secrecy.

  •  bermuda   ( @bermuda@beehaw.org ) English
    36•1 year ago

    Important to note for any readers that the suit by the US government is related to digital advertising. they’re not alleging monopolization when it comes to search engines.

    •  Izzy   ( @IzzyData@lemmy.ml ) 
      25•1 year ago

      It just pulled in the first frame of the video on the website. The reason Bill Gates is in this video is because of a famous anti-trust lawsuit against Microsoft that can be thought of as an equivalent of this one against Google.

  •  AutoTL;DR   ( @autotldr@lemmings.world ) BEnglish
    3•1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:

    Google is a very powerful corporation worth around $2 trillion, it controls access to the internet, and it will roll out generative artificial intelligence for billions of people.

    “The Bill Gates on the courtroom screen,” reported the New York Times, “was evasive and uninformed, pedantic and taciturn, a world apart from his reputation as a brilliant business strategist, guiding every step in Microsoft Corp.'s rise to dominance in computing.”

    For eight months, the Microsoft antitrust trial was front-page news, the drama of the trillion dollar personal computing revolution unveiled to the public.

    One result was that Microsoft, afraid of public exposure years later, refused to use its control over the browser to kill nascent rivals, in particular a young search company called Google.

    And yet, Mehta takes them seriously, which has led to an almost-entirely private trial, deadeningly boring to the public because key documents have been deleted and the important or embarrassing moments are held in secret.

    Indeed, when the judge expressed a bit of frustration that exhibits were posted publicly, government lawyers immediately pulled down their website and said they would work with Google to make sure everyone was satisfied with the process.

    The original article contains 1,784 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 89%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!