When the researchers drafted their report, they included a key suggestion: The DOT should craft federal regulations requiring side guards.
But that recommendation generated intense resistance, both internally, from department officials who challenged their findings, and externally, from trucking industry lobbyists.
… the department supervisor overseeing the project had a very direct message for the researchers. “PLEASE delete any mention of a recommendation to develop … any regulation,” he wrote in an email. “An industry standard is acceptable, but no mention of ‘regulation.’”
The industry objections resulted in a remarkable concession from the department: It allowed trucking company lobbyists to review the researchers’ preliminary report and provide comments on it.
By the time of its release in 2020, the report had been dramatically rewritten, stripped of its key conclusions — including the need to federally mandate side guards — and cut down by nearly 70 pages.
You must log in or register to comment.
Industry saving money at the expense of lives.
Or trying to make as much money as they can by killing as many Americans as their board and shareholders demand, to put it another way.
That’s shit. The ATA is garbage and only fights for the megacarriers.
As a former truck driver who has had the misfortune to be involved in TWO underride collisions I would happily spend the $3000 or so out of my own pocket just to never see what I saw again. (I won’t go into details as I do not want to relive those memories)
Obviously there’s limits on what’s practical to do, but seeing as this all worked out fine in Europe I’d call it a no brainer.
I love the smell of regulatory capture in the morning.
From looking at your own quote, even the DOT wasn’t unanimous on the decision.