- LinuxSBC ( @LinuxSBC@lemm.ee ) 52•1 year ago
So they figured out that a $130 Thunderbolt 4 100W E-marker cable is better designed than a $10 USB 2 60W cable? I think they should have looked at a cheaper high-end cable, like a 240W Thunderbolt 4 cable, to see how a comparable one compares.
- Jimbabwe ( @Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml ) English24•1 year ago
This was my gripe with the write up as well. Like everybody, I’m interested in the least expensive option with similar features to the $130 option. Surely there’s something in the $20-30 range they could’ve studied?
- realitista ( @realitista@lemm.ee ) 14•1 year ago
I wish they tested some other high quality but not as expensive cables against apple’s instead of the total junk ones. Baseus or something.
- RenardDesMers ( @RenardDesMers@lemmy.ml ) 13•1 year ago
USB-C era has begun a long time ago, Apple fans waking up from their bubble
- BorgDrone ( @BorgDrone@lemmy.one ) English12•1 year ago
You do know that Apple was involved in the development of USB-C (about a quarter of the people working on it were from Apple) and was one of the first companies to put USB-C on a laptop (in 2015) ?
- Appoxo ( @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 6•1 year ago
Involved doesnt mean they implemented it fully (until now).
- BorgDrone ( @BorgDrone@lemmy.one ) English6•1 year ago
I remember it being fully implemented on my MacBook. What exactly was missing?
- LinuxSBC ( @LinuxSBC@lemm.ee ) 5•1 year ago
iPhones.
- BorgDrone ( @BorgDrone@lemmy.one ) 3•1 year ago
True, because they already had a better connector for that specific use-case. But USB-C and Thunderbolt have been implemented on MacBooks for ages.
- JWBananas ( @JWBananas@startrek.website ) English2•1 year ago
The vastness of the ecosystem built around Apple products cannot be understated. You can’t just change the iPhone port every few years.
Ditching the 30-pin adapter created no small degree of controversy. Though the device itself got favorable reviews, the New York Times’ tech columnist at the time called it “not just a slap in the face to loyal customers” but a “jab in the eye.”
The Lightning connector was introduced on September 12, 2012, with iPhone 5. And there was so much controversy around it that they publicly committed to using it for at least 10 years.
The USB-C spec was not finalized until nearly two years later, in August 2014.
I can’t fault a company for activity committing to a decade of compatibility with peripherals. And I certainly can’t fault them for avoiding the disaster called Micro USB.
- Appoxo ( @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 2•1 year ago
iPhones were missing (until now)
- Rascabin ( @Rascabin@lemmy.ml ) 4•1 year ago
So what? They didn’t implement the port on the iPhone until recently. When did USB-C come out again? …
- BorgDrone ( @BorgDrone@lemmy.one ) English3•1 year ago
So? They implemented it fully on their laptops.
- Rascabin ( @Rascabin@lemmy.ml ) 5•1 year ago
Oh right, i forgot Mac’s are primarily used for making phone calls, texts, are kept in pockets when traveling, and USB-C is mainstream now so charging is a breeze, but screw iphones ami’rite?
- BorgDrone ( @BorgDrone@lemmy.one ) English4•1 year ago
What does making phone calls have to do with anything?
And who even uses a cable to charge their phone? I can’t remember the last time I used a cable to charge my phone, it’s probably years ago.
- Rascabin ( @Rascabin@lemmy.ml ) 6•1 year ago
Come on man. The talk has always been about apple not implementing the industry standard charging port on their phones. It goes back to the 30 pin days. They just want to make proprietary items for mad profits and milk it until all sheeps wake up.
- BorgDrone ( @BorgDrone@lemmy.one ) 3•1 year ago
Both the 30 pin connector and Lightning were much more capable than the ‘industry standard’ at the time they were introduced.
- NattyNatty2x4 ( @NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org ) 1•1 year ago
Apple fans when Apple finally gets slapped for being the cunt it is: