• I think vzq’s point is that you can write good, readable code that doesn’t do what the user wants. Same with other metrics that are ripe for navel-gazing like code coverage.

      It’s bordering on a false dichotomy… but I also believe that dynamic, untyped languages have proven exceptionally useful for rapid prototyping and iteration.

      •  vzq   ( @vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I must admit that I write that deliberately to annoy the “code quality is everything” brigade.

        I have no issues prioritizing maintainability where needed, but in my experience people that dogmatically prioritize code quality are not honest with themselves. They almost never chase code quality in general. They are always looking to enforce some burdensome standard or specific tool or archaic process or fiddly CICD script, and if you push back they go cry in a corner about the abstract virtue of “code quality”.

        Just be straight with me. You enjoy using type script. Tell me how it adds value to the product and the customer.

        Stop trying to shame me into it. I can’t be shamed. I have no shame. I’m a professional software engineer.

      • but I also believe that dynamic, untyped languages have proven exceptionally useful for rapid prototyping and iteration.

        Except that prototypes never end up as just prototypes, they die or become the real app with lots of masking tape.

    •  vzq   ( @vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      What an utterly blind, self-centered view.

      This is a really surprising retort.

      In the end, the only thing that has value is what ends up in the user’s hands. The rest is only a means to an end, in the very best case.

      This is not a controversial take in professional software development.

      What is self centered and self absorbed is putting misguided notions of “craftsmanship” and maintainability over business needs.

      • If you can’t see that writing readable code is part of the means to that end, I don’t know what to tell you. If nobody can maintain the codebase because it’s a mess of spaghetti logic and 20-deep dependency trees (I’m looking at you, every JavaScript project I’ve ever seen), the end product is going to suffer while also making every single engineer working on it want to leave.

        This is not a controversial take in professional software development.

        Funny, it sure seems like “maintainability should not be a priority” is a pretty controversial take to me.

        • You are making a lot of assumptions. You don’t know what my product is, how it is developed, what it’s used for, what its lifecycle is. Whether improving maintainability or code quality would be a net benefit, and whether using type script would be a possible solution.

          You also didn’t bother to find out.

          You just charge at me guns blazing, trying to string me up for heresy.

          Funny, it sure seems like “maintainability should not be a priority” is a pretty controversial take to me.

          How many things can you prioritize?

          In my world we prioritize one. And that not the one.