uhhh... what do I call the "subreddits"? falcoignis ( @falcoignis@reddthat.com ) Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year ago message-square194fedilinkarrow-up1175
arrow-up1175message-squareuhhh... what do I call the "subreddits"? falcoignis ( @falcoignis@reddthat.com ) Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year ago message-square194fedilink
minus-square unfazedbeaver ( @unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one ) linkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-21 year agoAgree on a technical level, but in terms of the average netizen being able to visualize the relationship, “providers” makes it much easier
minus-square amiuhle ( @amiuhle@feddit.de ) linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoI don’t think we should try to visualize something that’s not there just because it’s (supposedly) easier for the average netizen.
minus-square unfazedbeaver ( @unfazedbeaver@lemmy.one ) linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoIts not too far off. No, its not like an ISP or a central server, but each instance IS a “provider” of a server and service. It’s not the worst moniker I have heard
Agree on a technical level, but in terms of the average netizen being able to visualize the relationship, “providers” makes it much easier
I don’t think we should try to visualize something that’s not there just because it’s (supposedly) easier for the average netizen.
Its not too far off. No, its not like an ISP or a central server, but each instance IS a “provider” of a server and service. It’s not the worst moniker I have heard