Gavin Newsom Veto Strikers' Unemployment Bill (SB-799)www.stoppopulationdecline.orgexternal-link tintory ( @tintory@lemm.ee ) Politics • 1 year ago message-square8fedilinkarrow-up118
arrow-up118external-linkGavin Newsom Veto Strikers' Unemployment Bill (SB-799)www.stoppopulationdecline.org tintory ( @tintory@lemm.ee ) Politics • 1 year ago message-square8fedilink
minus-square khalic ( @khalic@beehaw.org ) linkfedilink15•1 year agoI’ve rarely seen a source as sketchy as that…
minus-square fuzzywolf23 ( @fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org ) linkfedilink8•1 year agoThis is literally the blog of some dude in Texas.
minus-square tintory ( @tintory@lemm.ee ) OPlinkfedilink1•1 year agoGuess I should unsubscribe Popular Info and The Big Newsletter by the same logic
minus-square fuzzywolf23 ( @fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org ) linkfedilink4•1 year agoI mean, maybe? But in the meantime, don’t cite them as primary sources, ok?
minus-square tintory ( @tintory@lemm.ee ) OPlinkfedilink1•edit-21 year agoI will cite the ones that can back what they are reporting and least likely to defend shitty stuff Considering all other articles about SB 799 is trying to defend Newsom and this one doesn’t, and this one links Sen. Portantino response (one example https://news.yahoo.com/newsom-vetoes-unemployment-bill-strikers-010632833.html) I know which one I be using
minus-square prole ( @prole@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoThe one that confirms your previously held bias. Great way to choose news sources.
minus-square tintory ( @tintory@lemm.ee ) OPlinkfedilink1•1 year agoOH NO, I have a bias I am just so bias sharing smaller groups and subscribing to their newsletters and what not, especially as they come up content I like better and provided sources
I’ve rarely seen a source as sketchy as that…
This is literally the blog of some dude in Texas.
Guess I should unsubscribe Popular Info and The Big Newsletter by the same logic
I mean, maybe? But in the meantime, don’t cite them as primary sources, ok?
I will cite the ones that can back what they are reporting and least likely to defend shitty stuff
Considering all other articles about SB 799 is trying to defend Newsom and this one doesn’t, and this one links Sen. Portantino response (one example https://news.yahoo.com/newsom-vetoes-unemployment-bill-strikers-010632833.html)
I know which one I be using
The one that confirms your previously held bias. Great way to choose news sources.
OH NO, I have a bias
I am just so bias sharing smaller groups and subscribing to their newsletters and what not, especially as they come up content I like better and provided sources