West Coast baby

  • Hindsight is 20/20 does not make a good argument here. Cars are bad for people, we have the studies and the research.

    • they kill a higher number of people than other modes of transport.
    • on average car drivers are more unhealthy and die earlier than people who self propel/use public transport
    • fumes and particles from cars lower the air quality in cities and are responsible for more deaths than just collisions
    • even if you go full electric particles from the tyres released at speed are terrible for people
    • car parking is a massive waste of land in city centres
    • commerce benefits more from cycle infrastructure than car infrastructure because more people are likely to get off their bike to go in to a shop they didn’t intend to go to than car drivers who have to find a parking space

    There are definitely more examples of why cars are bad in urban settings. Banning cars in city centres is the very easy solution that would make everyone’s lives in the cities better today. It’s also not a super crazy solution, cars didn’t always occupy space in cities.

    Also car drivers are not the majority in cities or even some contries but somehow the whole population is beholden to them.

    •  Umbrias   ( @Umbrias@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yes… We have studies now which show many of these things… Okay so you’re just kind of repeating talking points here instead of holding conversation. Have a good one!

      • Apologies if I ended up just listing things you already knew. I think your reply annoyed me as your conclusion that we will know even better 20 years from now while correct can be used as an excuse to wait till we know better. If I have to wait 20 or more years to get pedestrian/bike first infrastructure where i live, when there’s plenty of examples of it working elsewhere I’ll be fuming.

        • You probably will yes for many areas. Public works are slow.

          But you’re missing the point here. The point is that if we start making xyz changes now, say a bike lane, in 20 years we’ll have figured out “ooh shit we shouldnt built it like this oops”. Improvements which maybe solve one issue, may cause others, we’ll find out later. Nothing is a magic fix.

          • But as you said public works are slow. If we build it now, people benefit from the change while we figure out how to improve beyond our current thinking/physical situation. If we wait everyone has to deal with the current issues potentially forever since we should always wait because there will always be a better idea further down the line. Yes it’ll never be a perfect solution but its still objectively better than the status quo.

            Also yes there my be unforseen issues caused by our implementation but there will be unforseen benefits as well. Is the glass half full or half empty…

            There is also semi-related known benefits like in the case of major public works and investment in infrastructure, they are usually pretty good for the economy.

            I understand your point that there is no such thing as a magic bullet solution. However you saying that in response to proposing well done cycle infrastructure as a solution is a perfect example of “perfection is the enemy of good”.