Confusing git terminologyjvns.cacross-posted to: programming@programming.devhackernews@derp.foo canpolat ( @canpolat@programming.dev ) M Git@programming.devEnglish • 11 months ago message-square5fedilinkarrow-up17
arrow-up17external-linkConfusing git terminologyjvns.ca canpolat ( @canpolat@programming.dev ) M Git@programming.devEnglish • 11 months ago message-square5fedilinkcross-posted to: programming@programming.devhackernews@derp.foo
minus-square aport ( @aport@programming.dev ) linkfedilink6•edit-211 months agoPeople would be a lot less confused if they would read the official git book instead of trying to force their they through life googling errors and cheatsheets.
minus-square sim642 ( @sim642@lemm.ee ) linkfedilink2•11 months agoPeople just nuke a local git repo and reclone if something goes wrong. There isn’t even an attempt to understand anything.
minus-square canpolat ( @canpolat@programming.dev ) OPlinkfedilinkEnglish1•11 months agoReading the manual? That’s cheating!
minus-square TechNom (nobody) ( @technom@programming.dev ) linkfedilinkEnglish1•11 months ago+1. Git is one of those projects that supply official, authoritative, comprehensive and easy-to-understand documentation.
People would be a lot less confused if they would read the official git book instead of trying to force their they through life googling errors and cheatsheets.
People just nuke a local git repo and reclone if something goes wrong. There isn’t even an attempt to understand anything.
Reading the manual? That’s cheating!
+1. Git is one of those projects that supply official, authoritative, comprehensive and easy-to-understand documentation.