Is BT over Tor still not recommened?blog.torproject.orgexternal-link umami_wasabi ( @umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml ) Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • edit-28 months ago message-square15fedilinkarrow-up144
arrow-up144external-linkIs BT over Tor still not recommened?blog.torproject.org umami_wasabi ( @umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml ) Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • edit-28 months ago message-square15fedilink
minus-square rufus ( @rufus@discuss.tchncs.de ) linkfedilinkEnglish49•8 months agoIt will never get recommended. It’s bad for the network and bad for your privacy.
minus-square umami_wasabi ( @umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml ) OPlinkfedilinkEnglish3•8 months agoCan you please elaborate more on my next post? Thanks. https://lemmy.ml/post/7508828
minus-square rufus ( @rufus@discuss.tchncs.de ) linkfedilinkEnglish23•edit-28 months agoI answered there. Not sure why you open a completely new post for that follow-up question?! You could have asked just here.
minus-square umami_wasabi ( @umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml ) OPlinkfedilinkEnglish2•8 months agoI thought it is better as the focus is different: one is about “Is a blog post written 13 years ago still valid today”, the other one is “If BT protocol leaks information anyways, why VPN is acceptable but other’s not.” That’s the reasoning.
It will never get recommended. It’s bad for the network and bad for your privacy.
Can you please elaborate more on my next post? Thanks. https://lemmy.ml/post/7508828
I answered there. Not sure why you open a completely new post for that follow-up question?! You could have asked just here.
I thought it is better as the focus is different: one is about “Is a blog post written 13 years ago still valid today”, the other one is “If BT protocol leaks information anyways, why VPN is acceptable but other’s not.” That’s the reasoning.