•  Pxtl   ( @Pxtl@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    210 months ago

    Fair point. Will correct my above post. But either way: unless you find screens particularly eye-straining or have extreme battery-life desires, I don’t really see e-ink tech as worth the downsides at this point, at least for non-text content. For a watch where I want an always-on screen and endless battery and I’ll never watch video on it? Yes, I want more e-ink and low-power LED tech and the like. But for tablets? I’m good with the vibrant colors of a glowing LED screen.

    •  jcarax   ( @jcarax@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      Watches sound great on e-ink, but last I looked into it, the displays couldn’t support the frequency of refreshes over a reasonable life time.

      I’m with you, by the way. I do like having a compact e-ink reader, but I really don’t want to do anything but that with it.

      •  Pxtl   ( @Pxtl@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Huh, that’s disappointing. It’s funny how everybody keeps experimenting but nobody seems to have topped the Pebble for watch form-factor: low-power gameboy-ish LED screen and more of an old-school micro-controller chip instead of a phone-like chip and just use the “shake to wake” functionality to brighten the backlight.

        Pebble might not have been the smartest smartwatch, but it was definitely the watchyest smartwatch. Always-on screen and week-long battery.