Jack Smith asks Supreme Court to weigh Trump's immunity argumentwww.axios.com Chris Remington ( @remington@beehaw.org ) MA Politics • 7 months ago message-square10arrow-up127
arrow-up127external-linkJack Smith asks Supreme Court to weigh Trump's immunity argumentwww.axios.com Chris Remington ( @remington@beehaw.org ) MA Politics • 7 months ago message-square10
minus-square Melody Fwygon ( @fwygon@beehaw.org ) linkfedilink2•7 months agoPersonally I would expect 2 or 3. Most likely 3, so they can appeal to sensibilities and say they plugged up the executive power loophole until an act of Congress modifies the constitution thusly.
minus-square Shhalahr ( @Shhalahr@beehaw.org ) linkfedilink2•7 months ago“This decision does not set a precedent.”
Personally I would expect 2 or 3. Most likely 3, so they can appeal to sensibilities and say they plugged up the executive power loophole until an act of Congress modifies the constitution thusly.
“This decision does not set a precedent.”