Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) MA to Politics · 3 年前Jack Smith asks Supreme Court to weigh Trump's immunity argumentwww.axios.comexternal-linkmessage-square9linkfedilinkarrow-up127
arrow-up127external-linkJack Smith asks Supreme Court to weigh Trump's immunity argumentwww.axios.comChris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) MA to Politics · 3 年前message-square9linkfedilink
minus-squareMelody Fwygon ( fwygon@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 年前Personally I would expect 2 or 3. Most likely 3, so they can appeal to sensibilities and say they plugged up the executive power loophole until an act of Congress modifies the constitution thusly.
minus-squareShhalahr ( Shhalahr@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 年前“This decision does not set a precedent.”
Personally I would expect 2 or 3. Most likely 3, so they can appeal to sensibilities and say they plugged up the executive power loophole until an act of Congress modifies the constitution thusly.
“This decision does not set a precedent.”