Chris Remington ( @remington@beehaw.org ) MA to Politics · 2 years agoJack Smith asks Supreme Court to weigh Trump's immunity argumentwww.axios.comexternal-linkmessage-square9linkfedilinkarrow-up127
arrow-up127external-linkJack Smith asks Supreme Court to weigh Trump's immunity argumentwww.axios.com Chris Remington ( @remington@beehaw.org ) MA to Politics · 2 years agomessage-square9linkfedilink
minus-square Melody Fwygon ( @fwygon@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoPersonally I would expect 2 or 3. Most likely 3, so they can appeal to sensibilities and say they plugged up the executive power loophole until an act of Congress modifies the constitution thusly.
minus-square Shhalahr ( @Shhalahr@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years ago“This decision does not set a precedent.”
Personally I would expect 2 or 3. Most likely 3, so they can appeal to sensibilities and say they plugged up the executive power loophole until an act of Congress modifies the constitution thusly.
“This decision does not set a precedent.”