in general, there’s a lack of media coverage of comments like this outside of the partisan blogs–which is absurd to me, since this is the most explicitly fascist Trump has been. the debate over whether he is one is basically over in my view.
At this point, the goal is to normalize the rhetoric. He’s been very effective at being able to downplay things by having said them for years. We know his playbook; he’s continuing to follow it.
CNN is covering it this evening, along with some of his other recent announcements (which amount to rounding up his political enemies & millions more besides), but infuriatingly still downplaying what his vision entails, nor how popular that is with Republican voters.
It seems like a weird balance to try and strike. They know he’s popular with a big chunk, it’s also known that he’s full of vile rhetoric that ‘should’ be easily taken as contemptible and have him sent straight to the shitcan.
In normal past time it might have done just that, but these days it seems just as likely people put it together as “he’s popular and says terrible things, therefore it means it’s ok to say terrible things” rather than this guy should be reviled for saying terrible things.
Trump’s latest comments about “vermin,” “retribution,” “day-one dictator,” and “poisoning the blood” have hit Associated Press, NPR, Reuters, and BBC, who have responded matter-of-factly by comparing to it to the rhetoric of Nazis and Mussolini. Mein Kampf got name-dropped more than once.
I am also seeing coverage from CNN, ABC, USNews, USAToday, and NBCNews.
Now, which media you consider mainstream, and what kind of coverage you consider adequate can change the answer. I don’t know what they’re saying on TV, for example. But when even Forbes runs a front-page article which compares Trump’s rhetoric to Hitler’s in the first paragraph, I’d say there’s no lack of mainstream coverage, and they’re not dancing around the issue anymore.
in general, there’s a lack of media coverage of comments like this outside of the partisan blogs–which is absurd to me, since this is the most explicitly fascist Trump has been. the debate over whether he is one is basically over in my view.
At this point, the goal is to normalize the rhetoric. He’s been very effective at being able to downplay things by having said them for years. We know his playbook; he’s continuing to follow it.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJA_jUddXvY7v0VkYRbANnTnzkA_HMFtQ
CNN is covering it this evening, along with some of his other recent announcements (which amount to rounding up his political enemies & millions more besides), but infuriatingly still downplaying what his vision entails, nor how popular that is with Republican voters.
It seems like a weird balance to try and strike. They know he’s popular with a big chunk, it’s also known that he’s full of vile rhetoric that ‘should’ be easily taken as contemptible and have him sent straight to the shitcan.
In normal past time it might have done just that, but these days it seems just as likely people put it together as “he’s popular and says terrible things, therefore it means it’s ok to say terrible things” rather than this guy should be reviled for saying terrible things.
Trump’s latest comments about “vermin,” “retribution,” “day-one dictator,” and “poisoning the blood” have hit Associated Press, NPR, Reuters, and BBC, who have responded matter-of-factly by comparing to it to the rhetoric of Nazis and Mussolini. Mein Kampf got name-dropped more than once.
I am also seeing coverage from CNN, ABC, USNews, USAToday, and NBCNews.
Now, which media you consider mainstream, and what kind of coverage you consider adequate can change the answer. I don’t know what they’re saying on TV, for example. But when even Forbes runs a front-page article which compares Trump’s rhetoric to Hitler’s in the first paragraph, I’d say there’s no lack of mainstream coverage, and they’re not dancing around the issue anymore.