• Cryptocurrencies are volatile and awful for the environment

    Yes, volatility is bad and likely one reason why it will take a long time until crypto becomes a widely accepted means of payment, and that what it is to me. I consider crypto more as a means of payment (rather than an asset to invest in), and blockchain a good tool for introducing complementary currency systems.

    Yes, its not good for the environment, but we should also discuss GAFAM’s data centers, let alone artificial intelligence (which consumes much more energy - Microsoft even announced its plan to use small modular nuclear reactors to help them with their AI ambitions back in the fall).

    I feel there is a need for a broader public debate on the ecological impact of our digital life, there is almost no data and research about it. But in principal I agree, we needed to discuss the environmental impact also of blockchain.

    • Microsoft even announced its plan to use small modular nuclear reactors to help them with their AI ambitions back in the fall

      That’s good, environmentally. That ensures it won’t be increasing demand for fossil fuel energy by relying on the grid suppliers.