More honest than everything else reported this week on the issue.

  •  sqgl   ( @sqgl@beehaw.org ) OP
    link
    fedilink
    55 months ago

    “There has been a smear campaign against Palestinians… by smearing us as anti-Semites or as people who are celebrating terror and that could not be further from the truth.”

    And yet the same guy says:

    “I did, at the time, point out there were anti-Semitic phrases that I heard”

    I don’t think he understands the phrase “that could not be further from the truth.”

      •  sqgl   ( @sqgl@beehaw.org ) OP
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Steady on. No need to get dramatic and accuse me of stuff.

        If nobody said anything racist then that would be further from the truth.

        The guy misspoke implying nothing could be further from the truth.

        •  sqgl   ( @sqgl@beehaw.org ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          While it is commendable that these organisers toned down subsequent rallies, I don’t recall even a few bad apples amongst the Sydney Jewish community ever publicly celebrating the slaughter of Palestinians.

            •  sqgl   ( @sqgl@beehaw.org ) OP
              link
              fedilink
              15 months ago

              Yes. Although “From the River to the Sea” I would argue is anti-Semitic and they sure are using that, in fact the Left wing have also taken this on.

              The same day of the Oct 7 Massacre I went to a music gig at a venue in Camperdown where the host expressed solidarity with Palestine but didn’t utter a word of sorrow or regret for the slaughter by Hamas.

                •  sqgl   ( @sqgl@beehaw.org ) OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  You may be following the negotiations more closely than me so I am not sure how useful my opinion is. In fact I only just looked it up.

                  AFAIK there is no bombing now so the terms of the proposed ceasefire are important.

                  a Hamas official in Beirut, Osama Hamdan, also reiterated that any deal short of a permanent ceasefire was likely to be rejected.

                  Dunno if a permanent one is a good idea. Would be good to eliminate Hamas but I don’t even know if that is realistic. Would be even better to eliminate Bibi.

                  I do know that The Greens (whom I have always supported until this incident) walked out when Labor refused to sign the initial call for a cease-fire. Labor later explained that the document didn’t even mention October 7 so I feel they were right to not sign that time.

                  Presumably the document was amended soon after because Labor did then sign it about a week later. Do you recall the details?