Previously LGPL, now re-licensed as closed-source/commercial. Previous code taken down.

Commercial users pay $99/year, free for personal use but each user has to make a free account after a trial period.

    • Hey, A lot of people spent their precious free time to look at your project, test it out, and talking about it to their colleagues. How are you going to pay us for wasting however many minutes or hours of time spent on your supposedly open source project before you did the bait-and-switch?

      (By “you” I meant the developer.)

    • @HKayn This may sound cold hearted and I swear I’m not:

      There is no obligation for the world in general to pay someone for open source software. (right now)

      Everyone should think long hard about writing software and donating time and effort because of this.

      I don’t like this state of things, I would prefer some kind of “general usefulness” tax financed grant thing.

    • It’s quite entitled and dishonest to expect free beta-testing, marketing, and clout from the use of FOSS as a shortcut for your product.

      If you are sincere then you should know what you are getting into when you create that license.txt with LGPL terms on it.

      • It’s quite entitled and dishonest to expect free beta-testing, marketing, and clout from the use of FOSS as a shortcut for your product.

        Either show us where they voiced this expectation, or stop talking out of your ass.

    • Donations can give you hobby money. Not “multi-millionaire, going to retire” money. If people who start FOSS projects don’t want to admit that, then they are just looking for free popularity/shortcut to success. They can stop abusing the FLOSS community just so they can make a quick buck.