“I will no longer be complicit in genocide [in Gaza]. I am about to engage in an extreme act of protest,” the man apparently said before setting himself alight and repeatedly shouting “Free Palestine!”

Archive link

    •  octopus_ink   ( @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      But they know possibilities right?

      If I say “guy in a store with a gun” - he could be a robber, he could be a murderer, he could have hostages, etc.

      This guy was down, engulfed in flames, and not screaming when they drew. So what possibilities come up when I say “guy on the ground, on fire, past the ability to communicate or travel under his own power” that is a problem a gun could solve?

      In any case this:

      They don’t know what they’re walking into. We know after the fact what they had.

      Is just a more palatable (to you) way to say this, which is what I wrote in the first comment of mine you replied to:

      this was an example (once again) that “try to kill anything you don’t immediately understand” is the default condition of our law enforcement.

      See, we agree!

        •  octopus_ink   ( @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Why even bother to reply if that’s the only thing you are capable of saying? We both know there isn’t a reasonable answer to the question I keep asking.

          Fuckers threatening a service-member with deadly force for compliance while he burns to death, and lots of folks jumping up to defend it. At the very least I refuse to accept these empty platitudes.

          Edit - clarification of wording

          •  GBU_28   ( @GBU_28@lemm.ee ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I mean, same to you?

            You don’t like the behavior of security staff who have one very cold, very unfriendly goal: keep the embassy safe. I doubt they have specific training on self immolation so obviously they used standard procedure.

            They don’t give a fuck about public perception, the feelings of the involved individuals, etc.

            Everyone keeps asking " why weren’t they this or that or the other thing". There’s one root answer weather folks like it or not.

              •  GBU_28   ( @GBU_28@lemm.ee ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                34 months ago

                The actual answer is truly that these professional security types don’t care. They go guns ready for anything that is remotely threatening to the embassy. A dude on fire on the perimeter apparently counts, no matter what we think of that.