rulelemmy.mlimagecross-posted to: femcelmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0x2d ( @0x2d@lemmy.ml ) 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 4 months ago message-square21fedilinkarrow-up1384
arrow-up1384imagerulelemmy.ml 0x2d ( @0x2d@lemmy.ml ) 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 4 months ago message-square21fedilinkcross-posted to: femcelmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-square ImplyingImplications ( @ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca ) linkfedilink9•4 months agoI mean, seems like a textbook example of satire.
minus-square LinkOpensChest.wav ( @LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) linkfedilink19•4 months agoThe original comic was created to illustrated the absurdity of misusing1 the word “literally.” Then, conservatives captioned it and shared it unironically as an anti-LGBTQ+ meme. Then, a third group understandably found the conservatives’ version laughable, and it’s been mostly shared ironically ever since. 1I don’t necessarily agree with the post. It’s okay to use “literally” just for emphasis, in my opinion.
I mean, seems like a textbook example of satire.
The original comic was created to illustrated the absurdity of misusing1 the word “literally.” Then, conservatives captioned it and shared it unironically as an anti-LGBTQ+ meme. Then, a third group understandably found the conservatives’ version laughable, and it’s been mostly shared ironically ever since.
1I don’t necessarily agree with the post. It’s okay to use “literally” just for emphasis, in my opinion.