• Do you know why steam is dominating? There are no better alternatives. They actively work on projects that benefit everyone, including their competition.

    For the time being, there’s nothing to be said other than other companies need to stop being so shitty.

          • I’d agree with your statement in isolation, but

            Valve forever more have my support

            sure sounds a lot like the definition of loyalty:

            “a strong feeling of support or allegiance“

            • I think you are reading too much into the word choice, which was phrased a lot more like “I will always be grateful for steam doing this thing” and not “I will follow steam even if they join Sauron’s legions”.

          • Gabe doesn’t know you, you don’t know him, Gabe represents a concept to you all. To be loyal to him is at best a parasocial relationship. He is not your dad, he’s not your professor, he’s not any kind of mentor to you, he’s just someone who doesn’t speak much publicly, and gets good PR because his capitalist interests happen to align with consumers right now. 15 years ago, Elon Musk fell into the same boat.

            Look, I enjoy gaming on Linux as much as the next person, but I’ve also seen gamers make this completely unnecessary fanboy move over and over for decades.

            not falling down the capitalistic hole of exploiting their users for every red cent.

            The concept of a “hat shop” was literally invented by TF2 and every other game copied them. And they’re arguably exploiting small devs for every “red” cent while cutting breaks to the billionaire publishers. They also make devs eat the full cost of a refund. You’re not going to defend that behavior, you can only say “doesn’t affect me specifically” and ignore it.

            But what if we didn’t ignore it? What if instead we praised their good behaviors AND rebuked the bad? What if we just behaved like responsible consumers? Imagine…

            • I don’t think that taking a cut for the sheer exposure of the platform is the same as exploitation. Even small devs make more money by an order of magnitude through steam than they would if they did not.

              Steam costs money to operate. I really don’t understand why people think steam should just be valorous and noble and not make any money. Labeling them the middleman implies they don’t do anything. They provide a service in the same way a grocery store is there to make sure you don’t have to drive to a different farm every time you want a different kind of vegetable.

              That’s really the only problem I have with what you said. Of course people shouldn’t be loyal to companies, I’m just pointing out the flaw in your logic that people should be loyal to people instead. Any type of figure that you don’t personally know is primarily a concept.

              But also, “Behaving like a responsible consumer” is an idealistic fantasy that mostly fails because of the prisoner dilemma. If not enough people do it, the only people who suffer are the ones doing it. That base mindset might be overcame on an individual basis, but it’s rarely popular enough to gain the traction required for actual change, and it becomes more and more difficult the more people are content with the service.

              It doesn’t help that steam is essentially the only game launcher that isn’t tiny or garbage.

              • Steam costs money to operate. I really don’t understand why people think steam should just be valorous and noble and not make any money.

                This is exactly the point I’m making. Or rather, I really don’t understand why people think steam IS valorous and noble and not just making money.

                I’m just pointing out the flaw in your logic that people should be loyal to people instead. Any type of figure that you don’t personally know is primarily a concept.

                Agreed. I don’t follow why that means you should have loyalty for them.

                “Behaving like a responsible consumer” is an idealistic fantasy that mostly fails because of the prisoner dilemma.

                Totally agree.

                It doesn’t help that steam is essentially the only game launcher that isn’t tiny or garbage.

                I agree with basically everything you said. I just think the rational implication is to be reservedly greatful for the parts that benefit you, and readily critical of the parts that don’t. And I don’t understand why people instead reach the conclusion that one or two random alignments in interests means they should swear their allegiance to a corporation that cannot possibly do the same for them.

    • Yea, steam actually earned their market share through being a solid storefront and game distribution center and not because of exclusive releases from third parties or shady practices beyond promoting games.

      Sure, they are the only place for valve games, but that is because those are their games. Yes, some of their games have loot boxes and that is all terrible, but that is the games and not inherent to steam.

      • Did they tho? Steam was absolutely terrible in the beginning, the only reason people used it back in the early days is because you needed it for super popular valve games. It had nothing to do with them being a solid storefront or anything of sorts.

        • I have used it since a few days after release (Sept 13, 2003) because I was playing Counterstrike. It made updates and finding play servers so easy even though it did have a rough start with connectivity. Honestly, it was better than whatever we had to use prior even with the issues.

          Once they sorted out the server issues and started adding non-valve games it became even more useful and we end up where we are now.

          They are currently still on top because of being a solid storefront and the other things I listed.

        •  stardust   ( @stardust@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1810 months ago

          And then look what happened after steam of companies saying PC is dead and not wanting to invest in it. It’s not like the market wasn’t open for anyone to enter. All the other companies didn’t care including Microsoft in their own platform. Even look at how barebones the launchers are compared to Steam and how all the companies didn’t care about Linux.

          It’s not like these opportunities were never around and Steam just happened to get good will. Companies still are putting in the bare minimum and have more trouble or maybe disinterest in matching the features of Steam than a new company making a smartphone. How ridiculous is that. That companies making a smartphone did a better job of trying to be modern than a companies attempt at a launcher.