F.T.C. Issues Ban on Worker Noncompete Clauseswww.nytimes.comexternal-link amigan ( @theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me ) PoliticsEnglish • 25 days ago message-square6fedilinkarrow-up159
arrow-up159external-linkF.T.C. Issues Ban on Worker Noncompete Clauseswww.nytimes.com amigan ( @theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me ) PoliticsEnglish • 25 days ago message-square6fedilink
minus-square The Fire Witch ( @tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) linkfedilink12•25 days agoI expect it to get overturned by SCOTUS in 3… 2…
minus-square amigan ( @theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me ) OPlinkfedilinkEnglish12•25 days agoI’m not so sure. Nobody is claiming the Bible ordains noncompetes, so we might be in the clear here.
minus-square ranandtoldthat ( @ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkEnglish9•25 days agoHave you heard the good news about supply-side Jesus? Even though this exact rule explicitly benefitted massive companies in California for decades, the fact that it also benefits labor even a little means the capitalist class will react very badly.
minus-square 4dpuzzle ( @tesseract@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkEnglish4•23 days ago Have you heard the good news about supply-side Jesus? No. First time. But this is hilarious and tragic at the same time! the fact that it also benefits labor even a little means the capitalist class will react very badly. They aren’t trying merely to steal wages, are they? They really want the peasants to suffer, don’t they?
I expect it to get overturned by SCOTUS in 3… 2…
I’m not so sure. Nobody is claiming the Bible ordains noncompetes, so we might be in the clear here.
Have you heard the good news about supply-side Jesus? Even though this exact rule explicitly benefitted massive companies in California for decades, the fact that it also benefits labor even a little means the capitalist class will react very badly.
No. First time. But this is hilarious and tragic at the same time!
They aren’t trying merely to steal wages, are they? They really want the peasants to suffer, don’t they?