Surging Loblaw boycott shows customer anger with grocery giant, says Mount Pearl organizerwww.cbc.ca lautan ( @lautan@lemmy.ca ) Canada@lemmy.ca • 2 months ago message-square18fedilinkarrow-up183
arrow-up183external-linkSurging Loblaw boycott shows customer anger with grocery giant, says Mount Pearl organizerwww.cbc.ca lautan ( @lautan@lemmy.ca ) Canada@lemmy.ca • 2 months ago message-square18fedilink
minus-square null ( @null@slrpnk.net ) linkfedilink2•2 months agoWho said it was a legal requirement?
minus-square GreyEyedGhost ( @GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca ) linkfedilink2•2 months ago They need continuous profit. The CEO swears an oath to shareholders to prioritize profit quarter after quarter ad infinitum. So root comment did.
minus-square null ( @null@slrpnk.net ) linkfedilink2•edit-22 months agoNeeds = laws? They’ll oust a CEO who doesn’t fill that need. No legal action required.
minus-square GreyEyedGhost ( @GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca ) linkfedilink1•2 months agoAh, I see you read the article. Now we’re back at the start and you can continue to go in circles without me.
minus-square null ( @null@slrpnk.net ) linkfedilink2•2 months agoHuh? You claimed that “need” = “law” – which is clearly nonsense. That’s where we are.
Who said it was a legal requirement?
So root comment did.
Needs = laws?
They’ll oust a CEO who doesn’t fill that need. No legal action required.
Ah, I see you read the article. Now we’re back at the start and you can continue to go in circles without me.
Huh? You claimed that “need” = “law” – which is clearly nonsense.
That’s where we are.