But the statement also insisted that the site was not an example of greenwashing.
“This is a direct consequence of the new legislation and is not related to our belief in the truth and accuracy of our environmental communications,” the group said.
ie, “we didnt remove the content because it contained greenwashing, we only removed the content because this legislation specifically calling out greenwashing”
ie, “we didnt remove the content because it contained greenwashing, we only removed the content because this legislation specifically calling out greenwashing”
wut
We’re taking the site down because greenwashing is illegal now, but we’re still insisting it didn’t contain greenwashing.