Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
 BluJay320   ( @BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone )  to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year ago

Antinatalism Rule

lemmy.blahaj.zone

message-square
115
link
fedilink
222

Antinatalism Rule

lemmy.blahaj.zone

 BluJay320   ( @BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone )  to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
115
link
fedilink
  •  sexy_peach   ( @sexy_peach@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    I believed this once, but then I went to therapy. People have thrived under way worse conditions.

    •  androogee (they/she)   ( @androogee@midwest.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m more worried about the reefs thriving

      •  sexy_peach   ( @sexy_peach@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Me too

        •  KyuubiNoKitsune   ( @KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then not having kids is one of the best things you can do.

          •  sexy_peach   ( @sexy_peach@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am not willing to sacrifice having children. It’s an integral part of life for me. Killing myself would probably be good for the climate as well.

            •  KyuubiNoKitsune   ( @KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Less good than not having children. But we are all free to make our own choices, but I don’t think that you can seriously hold both “I care about the environment” and “I’m choosing to bring life into the world and damage the environment” ideas in your head without a lot of hypocrisy.

              I know you may think, my one kid won’t have such a big impact on the environment, but when 7 billion think that, the problem is exponential.

              •  mobius_slip   ( @mobius_slip@beehaw.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                To be human is to hold contradicting understandings of reality in equal measure. The amount of people who hate the idea of animal cruelty (or environmental destruction for that matter), yet still consume animal products is astronomical.

                The environment will never be saved by trying to convince people to not have kids. It’s a biological staple of existence stretching back billions of years, and we as a species will never give that up.

                Having children gives us a species a more personal stake in the planet’s future, and it would be better to focus our energies on that angle instead of demonizing people who agree with you 95% of the time.

196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

  • No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
  • No genocide denial
  • No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
  • No namecalling
  • Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
  • Other things seen as cleary bad

Posting rules:

  • No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
  • No advertisements
  • No gore / violence
  • Mutual aid posts are not allowed

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn’t adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196’s:

  • !196@lemmy.world
  • !onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2 users / day
  • 444 users / week
  • 1.19K users / month
  • 4.67K users / 6 months
  • 668 local subscribers
  • 18.6K subscribers
  • 14K Posts
  • 76.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  •  Moss   ( @moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
  •  greembow   ( @greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
  •  Queue   ( @queue@beehaw.org ) 
  •  funky-rodent [he/him]   ( @funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
  •  Peachy [they/she]   ( @PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
  •  remotelove   ( @remotelove@lemmy.ca ) 
  •  Roflmasterbigpimp   ( @Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de ) 
  •  A_Very_Big_Fan   ( @A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee ) 
  •  qaz   ( @qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
  •  qaz   ( @qaz@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code