Why spend money on ChatGPT?feddit.orgimage Gollum ( @genfood@feddit.org ) Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 2 months ago message-square29fedilinkarrow-up1696
arrow-up1696imageWhy spend money on ChatGPT?feddit.org Gollum ( @genfood@feddit.org ) Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 2 months ago message-square29fedilink
minus-square Wugmeister ( @ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) linkfedilinkEnglish115•2 months agoIt works. Well, it works about as well as your average LLM
minus-square Empricorn ( @Empricorn@feddit.nl ) linkfedilinkEnglish17•2 months agoIn other words, it doesn’t work.
minus-square CanadaPlus ( @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org ) linkfedilink2•2 months agoI mean, it depends on what you’re doing. Supervision always required, though.
minus-square Quereller ( @Quereller@lemmy.one ) linkfedilink11•2 months agoGPT-4 gives a correct answer to the question.
minus-square Quereller ( @Quereller@lemmy.one ) linkfedilink10•2 months agoNo clue what Amazon is using. The one I have access to gave a sane answer.
minus-square CanadaPlus ( @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org ) linkfedilink1•edit-22 months agoThere’s probably some finetuning at play for Amazon’s thing which makes it tend to always give a straight answer, instead of stepping outside of the box and doing something like correcting an implicit assumption.
It works. Well, it works about as well as your average LLM
In other words, it doesn’t work.
I mean, it depends on what you’re doing. Supervision always required, though.
GPT-4 gives a correct answer to the question.
It’s 4, isn’t it?
No clue what Amazon is using. The one I have access to gave a sane answer.
There’s probably some finetuning at play for Amazon’s thing which makes it tend to always give a straight answer, instead of stepping outside of the box and doing something like correcting an implicit assumption.