Antinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimage BluJay320 ( @BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 2 months ago message-square116fedilinkarrow-up1220
arrow-up1220imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zone BluJay320 ( @BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 2 months ago message-square116fedilink
minus-square retrieval4558 ( @retrieval4558@mander.xyz ) linkfedilink3•2 months agoI’m not sure what your point is here
minus-square Prunebutt ( @Prunebutt@slrpnk.net ) linkfedilink16•2 months agoMy point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
minus-square retrieval4558 ( @retrieval4558@mander.xyz ) linkfedilink1•2 months agoAnd how does that relate to angels?
I’m not sure what your point is here
My point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
And how does that relate to angels?
They don’t exist either.
We agree there