The record in this case reflects Mr. Giuliani’s continued failure to meet his reporting obligations and provide the
financial transparency required of a debtor in possession.
Most significantly, none
of Mr. Giuliani’s business entities have made any production at all despite being required to do
so by the Rule 2004 Order.
So they were not transparent and the up to 10 million in assets and debt numbers may very well be made up.
Fifth, Mr. Giuliani has agreed to a one year filing bar following the dismissal of this case,
alleviating concerns that Mr. Giuliani would simply file another bankruptcy as soon as this case
is dismissed.
Seems like he chose case dismissal over financial transparency.
(It’s a long document, with multiple things/decisions, and legal speak, so having only skimmed for that detail, I may not have identified the or all significant parts. Discretion advised.)
Politico has the full text of the ruling up.
Thank you
So they were not transparent and the up to 10 million in assets and debt numbers may very well be made up.
Seems like he chose case dismissal over financial transparency.
(It’s a long document, with multiple things/decisions, and legal speak, so having only skimmed for that detail, I may not have identified the or all significant parts. Discretion advised.)