The empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkcross-posted to: cpp@programming.dev mox ( @mox@lemmy.sdf.org ) Programming@programming.dev • 1 day ago message-square23fedilinkarrow-up1105
arrow-up1105external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.com mox ( @mox@lemmy.sdf.org ) Programming@programming.dev • 1 day ago message-square23fedilinkcross-posted to: cpp@programming.dev
minus-square anti-idpol action ( @pkill@programming.dev ) linkfedilink2•6 hours agowake me up when Rust fixes its’ supply chain attacks susceptibility (solid stdlib and rejecting external crates, including transitive deps
minus-square TehPers ( @TehPers@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-25 hours agoIf you’re hoping for the standard lib to have things built on evolving standards and ecosystems like HTTP clients, then I doubt that will ever happen. There are plenty of examples of why that would be a terrible idea (urllib, std::regex, etc).
wake me up when Rust fixes its’ supply chain attacks susceptibility (solid stdlib and rejecting external crates, including transitive deps
If you’re hoping for the standard lib to have things built on evolving standards and ecosystems like HTTP clients, then I doubt that will ever happen. There are plenty of examples of why that would be a terrible idea (
urllib
,std::regex
, etc).