Very cool. I understand part of it, but I will have to do some work to really get it.
Nature Communications has a transparent peer review process, and there was a nice discussion between authors and reviewers while trying to get this published - which is worth looking at if you are interested in the divided opinion during the peer-review process that the article mentions.
Very cool. I understand part of it, but I will have to do some work to really get it.
Nature Communications has a transparent peer review process, and there was a nice discussion between authors and reviewers while trying to get this published - which is worth looking at if you are interested in the divided opinion during the peer-review process that the article mentions.
Paper (open access): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-33667-1
Peer-review file: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41467-022-33667-1/MediaObjects/41467_2022_33667_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Awesome, thanks for digging up the actual paper. :)