Cornflake ( @Cornflake@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 months agoThis one's for my minecraft rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square9linkfedilinkarrow-up1103
arrow-up1103imageThis one's for my minecraft rulelemmy.blahaj.zone Cornflake ( @Cornflake@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square9linkfedilink
minus-square Swedneck ( @Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agowe can’t truly 100% accurately conceptualize 4d shapes, but 3d shadows of 4d objects is piss easy and basically good enough
minus-square Ludrol ( @Ludrol@szmer.info ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoI think I can but I can’t really be sure that what we imagined is true. I can imagine 2+2=5 but it isn’t true. Also there is aphantasia and whole gradient of imagining capabilities. What if only a subset of humans can imagine 4d objects. My workflow: imagine a cube, imagine a second cube offset by 4D unit. connect the verticies.
we can’t truly 100% accurately conceptualize 4d shapes, but 3d shadows of 4d objects is piss easy and basically good enough
I think I can but I can’t really be sure that what we imagined is true. I can imagine 2+2=5 but it isn’t true.
Also there is aphantasia and whole gradient of imagining capabilities. What if only a subset of humans can imagine 4d objects.
My workflow: imagine a cube, imagine a second cube offset by 4D unit. connect the verticies.