I fully agree with you. I love trilium and don’t trust or see any reason to change to the form yet. It’s pretty feature complete except one issue for me. I don’t see maintenance mode an issue at all.
Does maintenance mode mean it won’t get new features, but if there’s any fixes that might come up to get it running on a future OS it’ll get it? Because I too am happy with the current state of it and don’t really need anything more from it.
The note says bugs will be fixed and security updates will be applied. But the last commit and release was 10 months ago. I wouldn’t get my hopes up too much.
I changed over to next early and have been very happy with it.
Some quality of life upgrades, but mostly refactoring the code for stability and maintenance.
I still disagree. Most of the quality of life “upgrades” are either not clear or just change the original vision. There is zero issue with stability that needs to be fixed too.
You evaluated the situation and concluded the change was not worth it for you. I have no problem with that, everyone decides for themselves what fits their use case. Like you say, it works just fine as it is.
I came to a different conclusion and like the changes that are happening. Not sure what from the original vision is changing.
Not familiar with the specific technologies used, but I have a good feeling about the refactoring taking place.
I fully agree with you. I love trilium and don’t trust or see any reason to change to the form yet. It’s pretty feature complete except one issue for me. I don’t see maintenance mode an issue at all.
Does maintenance mode mean it won’t get new features, but if there’s any fixes that might come up to get it running on a future OS it’ll get it? Because I too am happy with the current state of it and don’t really need anything more from it.
The note says bugs will be fixed and security updates will be applied. But the last commit and release was 10 months ago. I wouldn’t get my hopes up too much.
I changed over to next early and have been very happy with it.
Some quality of life upgrades, but mostly refactoring the code for stability and maintenance.
I still disagree. Most of the quality of life “upgrades” are either not clear or just change the original vision. There is zero issue with stability that needs to be fixed too.
You evaluated the situation and concluded the change was not worth it for you. I have no problem with that, everyone decides for themselves what fits their use case. Like you say, it works just fine as it is.
I came to a different conclusion and like the changes that are happening. Not sure what from the original vision is changing.
Not familiar with the specific technologies used, but I have a good feeling about the refactoring taking place.
Well there we go :)
I will comment one in their favor that the mobile experience on TN is 100% better but I rarely use it.
Right, the mobile view. I knew there was something specific I liked about it, forgot about the old one. Thanks for reminding me :)
I think the creator just doesn’t have time anymore. So nothing will be done.